BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep RC-- Comparable worth

Expert replies
by Lina » Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:46 am
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate
inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain
tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared.
In the last decade, this approach has become a critical
social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector
firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local
governmental entities have adopted comparable worth
policies or begun to consider doing so.
This widespread institutional awareness of comparable
worth indicates increased public awareness that pay
inequities-that is, situations in which pay is not "fair"
because it does not reflect the true value of a job-
exist in the labor market. However, the question still
remains: have the gains already made in pay equity
under comparable worth principles been of a
precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory,
a function of concessions made by employers to
mislead female employees into believing that they
have made long-term pay equity gains?
Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed
precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving
them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce
or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and
female workers have not remedied perceived pay
inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in
which men and women hold different jobs. But
whenever comparable worth principles are applied to
pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences
are eliminated. In this sense, then, comparable worth
is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as
the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in
dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational
categories) in an effort to determine whether or not
what is necessary to perform these tasks-know-how,
problem-solving, and accountability-can be quantified
in terms of its dollar value to the employer.
Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its
premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may
require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill;
may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in
an environment having a similar impact upon the
worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the
employer.

43. Which of the following most accurately states the
central purpose of the passage?
(A) To criticize the implementation of a new procedure
(B) To assess the significance of a change in policy
(C) To illustrate how a new standard alters procedures
(D) To explain how a new policy is applied in specific
cases
(E) To summarize the changes made to date as a
result of social policy

Please provide explanation to support your answers
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:01 am
IMO B

Passage weighs /values CW more than other mandates such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964.

Passage breifly touches upon the benfits of CW. Quote from Passage "But
whenever comparable worth principles are applied to
pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences
are eliminated.



Over all the author favours CW by showing its significance by manifesting its benefits over other mandates..

IMO B.

I scanned other choices..

A:A) To criticize the implementation of a new procedure

No where author criticises the new polocy.

C) To illustrate how a new standard alters procedures

Not really...

(D) To explain how a new policy is applied in specific
cases

Again, Author was generic about the CW and its implementation and scope.

(E) To summarize the changes made to date as a
result of social policy

Ok yeah ..he said so...but that is NOT the central tenet..rite??

IMO B
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:42 am
IMO: B, I agree with gmatmachoman. In fact, I also referred to the same quote to justify B.

Time in Reading : 3 mins
Time in answering : 110 secs

what is OA ?
Join the discussion