BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep q

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by nikhilagrawal » Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:34 am
E IMO
Join the discussion

by arorag » Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:38 am
It should be C
Join the discussion

by smallsorrow » Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:06 am
It is E.

But can you tell me why it is not C?


z or y can be in the ngeative area of the number line.
1 tells us that all together are positive. this means that two of them have to be negative or all three need to be positive

2 tells us that x and y are whether both pos or both negative...

if we combine 2 with one we should now that z lies on "other side" either way and is not between x and y ... this would mean answer C

Why am I wrong?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:04 am
IMO the easiest way to approach number line problems is to draw all possible cases and use each of the cases as required for the statements independently and together(if needed).

Given: the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z

Q: Is z between x and y

Case 1:

z -----x-------- y

Case 2:

y-------- x-- z

Case 3:

x--z---------y

Case 4:

y------z-------x


Stmt I

xyz < 0

Case 1(z-> neagtive x->positive y->positive) gives NO answer

Case 3 (x->negative z->positive y->positive) gives YES answer

INSUFF

Stmt II

xy < 0 (Either x is positive y negative or y is positive x is negative)

Case 2 gives us a NO answer

Case 3 gives us a YES answer

INSUFF


Stmt I and II together

Case 2 (y->negative x->positive z->positive) gives us a NO
Case 3 (x->negative z->positive y->positive) gives us a YES


INSUFF

Choose E)
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:07 am
I agree Cramya that the explanation is correct.
But that is time consuming.. for sure it will be atleast close to 2min..
Also in doing this approach, I am always worried whether I have forgotten a case/scenario ..

However, as of now, I dont have any other method.

A better way is to memorize the cases coz this type of question can easily occur.. as a 500-600 level q, and i would not want to spend too much time on this but still be accurate.

thanks
Join the discussion

by vishubn » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:26 am
A better way is to memorize the cases coz
True !! but wat u mean by memorizing??? !!

i mean vittal, do u have a set of possibilities ! which is standard thru out ??

vishi
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:00 am
OOO I meant create a combination of 3 variables, another combination of 4 variables.
Now, as I am writing this reply, I realize that is impractical.

So I am thinking that we need to solve more problems of this type so that creating the different cases becomes second nature and easy.

I remember seeing a few problems of this type.


Let me think further and see whether I can come up with a cookie cutter solution.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Dec 27, 2008 7:51 am
Vittal,
I tried to draw it pretty(avoid the pretty dashes---- on the real gmat) :-) .

Its the same as writing:

z x y
y x z

and then do the rest


Juts my opionion -> I would rather spend the 2 minutes to solve it to make sure I have covered all bases.

A better way is to memorize the cases coz this type of question can easily occur.. as a 500-600 level q, and i would not want to spend too much time on this but still be accurate
The only problem is the variables involved or their relationship will be different fro each problem so not sure if we can memorize a generic set of cases.

If there is an easier/generic approach, I am all for that.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion