BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep q

Expert replies
by smallsorrow » Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:07 am
For the students in class A the range of their hights is r centimeters and the greatest hight is g centimenters. Class B´s range of hights is s centimeters and greatest hight is h centimeters. Is the least hight of the students in class A greater than that of class B?
1. r < s
2. g> h

OA follows.
Have I missed a formula?? I would not know how to solve this...
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by csandeepreddy » Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:29 am
My guess is E.
Join the discussion

by dragonxlam » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:59 am
Well basically I think this is a good question to plug in the values.

The equations look something like this:

g-r = Lowest Height of kid in Group A
h-s = Lowest Height of kid in Group B

Looking at 1) r < s alone does not tell you anything since you don't know what g and h are to come to a conclusion.

Getting 2) g > h gives you more info and enables you to plug in some numbers.

g= 10
h=9

r=4
s=3

So Lowest height is 6 in group A but it is also the same in group B.

You can plug in more numbers so that group B is shorter so in this case the answer is E.
Join the discussion

by smallsorrow » Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:10 am
Guess what,
the OA is C. I picked E, too...

Anybody outthere who could explain in detail??
Join the discussion

by smallsorrow » Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:11 am
Guess what,
the OA is C. I picked E, too...

Anybody outthere who could explain in detail??
Join the discussion

Re: gmat prep q

by Ian Stewart » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:28 am
smallsorrow wrote:For the students in class A the range of their hights is r centimeters and the greatest hight is g centimenters. Class B´s range of hights is s centimeters and greatest hight is h centimeters. Is the least hight of the students in class A greater than that of class B?
1. r < s
2. g> h

OA follows.
Have I missed a formula?? I would not know how to solve this...
dragonxiam- when you chose numbers here, you made r larger than s, when it should be smaller than s, which is why you've arrived at the wrong answer.

Neither statement is sufficient on its own- clearly we need to know about r, s, g and h here. Together we know:

s > r
g > h

These inequalities are in the same direction, so we can add them:

s+g > r+h
g-r > h-s

So we've shown that the smallest height in class A, which is g-r, is larger than the smallest height in class B, which is h-s. C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion