Diameter is 18 so circumference of semi circle = 18 pi /2 = 9 pi
PQ ll OR so angle R = angle P = 35
so arc OP = arc QR = 35 * 2 = 70
so arc PQ = 180 - ( arc OP + arc QR) = 40 deg
Since 180 deg corresponds to 9 pi
40 corresponds to 2 pi ( cross multiplication)
GMAT Prep Geometry Question
Source: Beat The GMAT — Problem Solving |
-
ssy
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:17 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:660
Thank you ri2007 but I am still confused.
Isn't the circumference of the semicircle (pi)(radius)+2pi, so the circumference in this case is [(pi)(9)+18]
Also, can you please explain the following steps
"so arc OP = arc QR = 35 * 2 = 70
so arc PQ = 180 - ( arc OP + arc QR) = 40 deg"
Thanks very much.
Isn't the circumference of the semicircle (pi)(radius)+2pi, so the circumference in this case is [(pi)(9)+18]
Also, can you please explain the following steps
"so arc OP = arc QR = 35 * 2 = 70
so arc PQ = 180 - ( arc OP + arc QR) = 40 deg"
Thanks very much.
Point 1) Circumference is 2 pi r or 2 pi d where d is the diameter,
Point 2) since PQ ll OR and angle R & angle P are the internal angles formed by the transversal - internal angles are equal.
Point 3) semicircle = 180 degrees
Point 2) since PQ ll OR and angle R & angle P are the internal angles formed by the transversal - internal angles are equal.
Point 3) semicircle = 180 degrees
-
ssy
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:17 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:660
Sorry I am still confused.
Point 1) Do you mean the circumference of a semi circle because isn't the circumference of the semi circle (pi)(radius)+diameter?
https://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/in ... n6D&show=7
Point 3) How can you subtract the length of the two arcs from 180 degrees?
Point 1) Do you mean the circumference of a semi circle because isn't the circumference of the semi circle (pi)(radius)+diameter?
https://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/in ... n6D&show=7
Point 3) How can you subtract the length of the two arcs from 180 degrees?
I have made one typing error earlier in explaining the formula for circumference of circle it is 2 pi r or pi d no 2 pi d as typed earlier by mistake. This is the right formulassy wrote:Sorry I am still confused.
Point 1) Do you mean the circumference of a semi circle because isn't the circumference of the semi circle (pi)(radius)+diameter?
https://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/in ... n6D&show=7
Point 3) How can you subtract the length of the two arcs from 180 degrees?
THis questions is either from OG or Kaplan. They have also give an explaination. You can check it
-
xcise_science
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:25 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
can someone explain this part to me:
Since 180 deg corresponds to 9 pi
40 corresponds to 2 pi ( cross multiplication)
I'm not clear on how/why 180 corresponds to 9pi.
thanks
Since 180 deg corresponds to 9 pi
40 corresponds to 2 pi ( cross multiplication)
I'm not clear on how/why 180 corresponds to 9pi.
thanks
- gkumar
- 2009 Beat The GMAT Scholarship Winner
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:35 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:700+
I'm still unclear why the degree measures of minor arcs PAO and QAR are equal. I understand why PAO has a measure 70 degrees, but not why QAR has a measure of 70 degrees. Can you please explain via a proof or some other explanation on how angles QAR = PAO?
Here's what I know so far (see attachment)
Here's what I know so far (see attachment)
- Attachments
-
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi!gkumar wrote:I'm still unclear why the degree measures of minor arcs PAO and QAR are equal. I understand why PAO has a measure 70 degrees, but not why QAR has a measure of 70 degrees. Can you please explain via a proof or some other explanation on how angles QAR = PAO?
Here's what I know so far (see attachment)
We know that angle APQ is 70 degrees (35+35). We also know that triangle APQ is isosceles, since both AP and AQ are radii of the circle.
Therefore, angle AQP is also 70 degrees, leaving 40 degrees for central angle PAQ.
So, PAO is 70 and PAQ is 40. 180 - 110 = 70 degrees left over for angle QAR.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- gkumar
- 2009 Beat The GMAT Scholarship Winner
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:35 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:700+
Thanks Stuart! I forgot about the isoceles triangle part. All of these angles are hard to keep track and manage under 2 minutes. Is it possible to use Symmetry to assume that QAR is automatically equal to PAO?
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
We need to careful not to assume that everything will be symmetrical, so it's not a safe bet.gkumar wrote:Thanks Stuart! I forgot about the isoceles triangle part. All of these angles are hard to keep track and manage under 2 minutes. Is it possible to use Symmetry to assume that QAR is automatically equal to PAO?
However, the fact that all triangles radiating out from the centre of a circle are isosceles is commonly tested, so be on the lookout for such situations.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

















