BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT prep DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by atlantic » Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:56 am
Hi mlane,

Everytime that you see inequalities, the best is to plug numbers.

(1) when x^2, x can be either positive or negative that x^2 is always positive, and that is the same that happens in mod(x), a negative number returns positive and a positive remains positive. Exactly what is said in this option. So SUFF.

(2) imagine the following negative numbers, x=-3 and y=-6. We can say that x is greater than y. Now try to compute these numbers on the inequality, you get 3>6, which is not true. Now picking x=6 and y=3, that satisfy x>y, the inequality give us 6>3. Two different results for the same proposition, so INSUFF.

Answer A.
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:51 pm
That makes perfect sense!! Thanks for the explanation! :-)
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:24 am
Good solution!

Another way to attack this is to actually change the question.

Remember, we can do whatever we want to an inequality as long as we do the same thing to both sides. As long as we don't multiply or divide by a negative, inequalities follow the exact same rules as equations.

Is |x| > |y|?

Well, let's square both sides! We know that both sides are positive, so nothing weird will happen. We can actually change the question to:

Is x^2 > y^2?

If we ask the question in this form, then it's easy to see that (1) is sufficient alone, since it states exactly what we want to know.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:02 am
That was a great explanation Stuart! The question makes total sense now! Thanks!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:57 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote: Remember, we can do whatever we want to an inequality as long as we do the same thing to both sides. As long as we don't multiply or divide by a negative, inequalities follow the exact same rules as equations.
No, that is not true- inequalities certainly do not 'follow the exact same rules as equations' with the one exception of multiplying or dividing by negatives. You cannot take reciprocals on both sides of an inequality. You cannot square both sides of an inequality. You cannot multiply two inequalities together. You cannot take the absolute value of both sides of an inequality. You cannot multiply both sides of an inequality by zero. I could go on. In each case, you risk arriving at something that is incorrect, unless you use additional information about the quantities on either side of the inequality. You can safely do all of these things with equations (with the lone exception of taking reciprocals when each side is equal to zero).

With an inequality, it is always safe to do the following: you can add or subtract the same quantitiy from both sides. You can multiply or divide by the same positive quantitiy on both sides. You can multiply or divide by the same negative quantity on both sides if you reverse the inequality. In other situations, we need to be more careful.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion