Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT prep DS question

Expert replies
by mlane25269 » Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:06 pm
HI guys! Need explanation on this one...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by atlantic » Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:56 am
Hi mlane,

Everytime that you see inequalities, the best is to plug numbers.

(1) when x^2, x can be either positive or negative that x^2 is always positive, and that is the same that happens in mod(x), a negative number returns positive and a positive remains positive. Exactly what is said in this option. So SUFF.

(2) imagine the following negative numbers, x=-3 and y=-6. We can say that x is greater than y. Now try to compute these numbers on the inequality, you get 3>6, which is not true. Now picking x=6 and y=3, that satisfy x>y, the inequality give us 6>3. Two different results for the same proposition, so INSUFF.

Answer A.
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:51 pm
That makes perfect sense!! Thanks for the explanation! :-)
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:24 am
Good solution!

Another way to attack this is to actually change the question.

Remember, we can do whatever we want to an inequality as long as we do the same thing to both sides. As long as we don't multiply or divide by a negative, inequalities follow the exact same rules as equations.

Is |x| > |y|?

Well, let's square both sides! We know that both sides are positive, so nothing weird will happen. We can actually change the question to:

Is x^2 > y^2?

If we ask the question in this form, then it's easy to see that (1) is sufficient alone, since it states exactly what we want to know.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:02 am
That was a great explanation Stuart! The question makes total sense now! Thanks!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:57 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote: Remember, we can do whatever we want to an inequality as long as we do the same thing to both sides. As long as we don't multiply or divide by a negative, inequalities follow the exact same rules as equations.
No, that is not true- inequalities certainly do not 'follow the exact same rules as equations' with the one exception of multiplying or dividing by negatives. You cannot take reciprocals on both sides of an inequality. You cannot square both sides of an inequality. You cannot multiply two inequalities together. You cannot take the absolute value of both sides of an inequality. You cannot multiply both sides of an inequality by zero. I could go on. In each case, you risk arriving at something that is incorrect, unless you use additional information about the quantities on either side of the inequality. You can safely do all of these things with equations (with the lone exception of taking reciprocals when each side is equal to zero).

With an inequality, it is always safe to do the following: you can add or subtract the same quantitiy from both sides. You can multiply or divide by the same positive quantitiy on both sides. You can multiply or divide by the same negative quantity on both sides if you reverse the inequality. In other situations, we need to be more careful.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion