BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep DI question- Experts please reply ASAP

Expert replies
by anks17 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:46 am
GMAT Experts,

Can you plz confirm the right way to approach the attached question.Assumed #s to solve it but just checking for a better/shorter method if any.
Attachments
Number Theory (3) GMAT Prep question.png
DS question- GMAT Prep
"doesn't matter ver u r...ur destiny depends upon vho u choose 2 b!!!!"
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by niketdoshi123 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:42 am
Given

In class A

Greatest height = g
range = r
Since , range = greatest - least
=> least height = g - r

In class B

Greatest height = h
range = s
=> least height = h - s

We are asked
Is g - r > h - s?

Statement 1:
no idea about g and h
Hence insufficient

Statement 2:
no idea about r and s
Hence insufficient

Combining both the statement

let r = 4 and s = 5
and let g = 8 and h = 7

g - r = 8 - 4 = 4
h - s = 7 - 5 = 2

Clearly 4>2
the answer to the question is a definite yes, hence sufficient

The correct answer is A
Join the discussion

by adthedaddy » Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:45 am
Note: Range=Greatest-Least

From the given data,
Least height of A=g-r ............(X)
Least height of B=h-s.............(Y)


To prove least height of A class is greater than least height of B class, we prove that
[(Least height of A) - (Least height of B)] > 0

From eqns (X) & (Y)
[(g-r)-(h-s)]>0 ...........(Z)

Taking options
(1) r<s or s-r>0
This does not give complete information.
INSUFFICIENT

(2) g>h or g-h>0
Even this does not give complete information.
INSUFFICIENT

Taking combined, we get
s-r>0 and g-h>0

From Eqn (Z) and given that s-r>0 and g-h>0,
We can rewrite it as,
[(s-r)+(g-h)]>0
SUFFICIENT

[spoiler]Ans: Option C[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by eagleeye » Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:56 am
anks17 wrote:GMAT Experts,

Can you plz confirm the right way to approach the attached question.Assumed #s to solve it but just checking for a better/shorter method if any.
I would do it this way.

First of all we need to realize that its an inequality question which is asking us.

Is least value of set A < least value of set S.
Now least value of A = Greatest A - Range of A = g-r
And least value of B = Greatest B - Range of B = h-s

So the question becomes, Is g-r > h-s
=> Is g+s > h+r (I rephrased it because I know for most people, + signs are easier to deal with).

Now its easy.

1) r<s => s>r. We don't know anything about g or h. Insufficient.
2) g>h. Again, we now nothing about s and r. Insufficient.

Together:

s > r
g > h
Since left sides of both inequalities are larger than the right sides we can add the two.
s + g > h + r. This is what we sought out to find. Sufficient.

C is correct.
Join the discussion