BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep CR--Lyme Disease

Expert replies
by bsandhyav » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:34 am
Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans by deer ticks. Generally deer ticks pick up the bacterium while in the larval stage from feeding on infected whitefooted mice. However, certain other species on which the larvae feed do not harbor the bacterium. Therefore, if the population of these other species were increased, the number of ticks acquiring the bacterium and hence the number of people contracting Lyme disease—would likely decline.

Which of the following it would be most useful to ascertain in evaluating the argument?

A. Whether populations of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed are found only in areas also inhabited by white footed mice.

B. Whether the size of the deer population is currently limited by the availability of animals for ticks ‘s larval stage to feed on

C. Whether the infected deer population could be controlled by increasing the number of animals that prey on white footed mice.

D.Whether deer ticks that were not infected as larvae can become infected as adults by feeding on deer on which infected deer ticks have fed.

E. Whether the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor any other bacteria that ticks transmits to humans.


Was confused between [spoiler]B & D[/spoiler]. Finally chose D. However OA is B.

Can anybody give a clear picture why B?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat740 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:27 pm
IMO-D

I also dont understand. To me, B looks out of scope. Would like to see the explanation. Are you sure about the OA?
Join the discussion

by bsandhyav » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:25 am
gmat740 wrote:IMO-D

I also dont understand. To me, B looks out of scope. Would like to see the explanation. Are you sure about the OA?
Sure about the OA. Atleast thats what the GMAT Prep software says!
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:12 am
I guess...we need to attack the assumptions here....

Assumption: increase in uninfected species => low numbers of deer eating these uninfected species => less disease among people....

B questions this assumption correctly....

Will increasing the uninfected species will lead to less number of deer eating these uninfected mice ?

Basically as option B asks.....
if number of deer are limited by amount of food available...
a) Yes:
then even after increasing the uninfected species it will not lead to less number of infected deer....as number of deer too will increase here....WEAKENS
b) No:
then after increasing the unifected species...it will lead to less number of infected deer. STRENGTENS...

IMO since C and D are not talking anything related to assumption...so I guess they are out of scope...

can someone please confirm the reason to kick out C and D please ?
Join the discussion