BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep - College

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sethids » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:46 pm
E should be the answer.

A. Incorrect comparison. Salaries cannot lag behind other professionals.

B. Same error as A.

C. less is not required after $24000 as its already mentioned that salaries continue to lag behind. Less introduces redundancy here. Also, the sentence formation is awkward.

D. Less is not required.

E. Perfect. Makes the correct comparison and does not include any unnecessary words.
Join the discussion

by rosh26 » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:47 pm
Why is less not required??
Join the discussion

by sethids » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:54 pm
rosh26 wrote:Why is less not required??
Less is not required because the sentence already mentions that the salaries "lag behind" those of other professionals.

Lag behind indicates that teachers' salaries are less. Therefore having less in the sentence introduces unnecessary redundancy.

For e.g. which one would be the correct sentence from the 2 below?

1. My salary continues to lag behind yours by $2000 less.

2. My salary continues to lag behind yours by $2000.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1