BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep 700's level

Expert replies
by atlantic » Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:04 am
Hi guys,

Got this one after 12 correct in a row. It was my question nr. 20 and I believe this one belongs to the 700's level. I got 49 on Quant. in this Prep.

I'll post OA later.
Attachments
20 of 37.jpg
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by erjamit » Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:07 am
Ans is A.

1) (3y+7)y = x => x is a multiple of y. Sufficient

2) x(x-1) = ny ( x(x-1) is a multiple of y).

x = ny/(x-1)...now it not necessary that x is a multiple of y. Insufficient.

Thus, A

I hope it helps

Amit
Join the discussion

by atlantic » Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:46 am
Yep erjamit, you got it. Answer is A.

For you it was a piece of cake. Great. I got it wrong, my answer was D.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:32 pm
erjamit wrote:x = ny/(x-1)...now it not necessary that x is a multiple of y. Insufficient.
I feel this part warrants additional explanation. For me, at least!

I got to this point as well, but then considered that
n/(x - 1) can be considered a constant for 'y'.

In this case, I considered x to be a multiple of y. Ack! What is wrong with my conclusion?
Join the discussion

by erjamit » Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:35 pm
n/(x - 1) can be considered a constant for 'y'.

ok look...x and y are integers as given by the stem and we are required to find whether x is a multiple of y.

both n and x-1 are integers, but is it necessary that n/(x-1) is also an integer...it can be it cant be...

I hope you are getting my point...

btw DS is my weak link...n m tryin to strengthen it...

Amit
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:25 am
beeparoo wrote:
erjamit wrote:x = ny/(x-1)...now it not necessary that x is a multiple of y. Insufficient.
I feel this part warrants additional explanation. For me, at least!

I got to this point as well, but then considered that
n/(x - 1) can be considered a constant for 'y'.

In this case, I considered x to be a multiple of y. Ack! What is wrong with my conclusion?
Well, I look at the statment y is a divisor of x(x-1), and while there could be many possibilities here, one possibility is certainly that y = x-1. And if x > 2, x is not divisible by x-1; the remainder would always be 1 in that case. Choose any x > 2, let y = x-1, and you'll see why the information is insufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion