BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat Prep 21 - 1 Need experts' help

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by maihuna » Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:55 am
imo B:

D is wrong, because experiments an unanimated one can not take active action as investigate, so is A

to investigate in E is fine to introduce a purpose, but "what the effects changes" make it awakwards.

for investigating in C is even worse as not suited for this purpose, at the same time contains that awufuol phrase "what the efeects changes".

investigating in B, keeps the action continued, the awkward phrase "what the effects changes" is abscent, make perfect sense.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:36 am
In the mid-1920s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance.

a) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance
b) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance.
c) for investigating what the effects on workers' performance are that changes in working conditions would cause
d) that investigated changes in working conditions' effects on workers' performance
e) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance
In A, it is unclear whether their refers to changes or to working conditions. Eliminate A.

In C, for investigating is unidiomatic. Eliminate C.

In D, a possessive construction such working conditions' should not be used to for an inanimate noun as conditions. Eliminate D.

E is hard to follow and needlessly wordy. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by tetura84 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:37 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
In the mid-1920s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance.

a) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance
b) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance.
c) for investigating what the effects on workers' performance are that changes in working conditions would cause
d) that investigated changes in working conditions' effects on workers' performance
e) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance
In A, it is unclear whether their refers to changes or to working conditions. Eliminate A.

In C, for investigating is unidiomatic. Eliminate C.

In D, a possessive construction such working conditions' should not be used to for an inanimate noun as conditions. Eliminate D.

E is hard to follow and needlessly wordy. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is B.
Mitch, I eliminated A & D because 'that' refers to experiments which is wrong.
However, I prefer E over B.
In B, can you please explain the role of 'that'? what it is? For me, if looks like that is a relative pronoun and the entire clause modifies 'effects' which is wrong I guess.

Also, can you say few words on 'would have' ? I know it is used for hypothetical conditions but would like to hear more from you.
78 clicks can change my life !
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:32 pm
tetura84 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
In the mid-1920s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance.

a) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance
b) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance.
c) for investigating what the effects on workers' performance are that changes in working conditions would cause
d) that investigated changes in working conditions' effects on workers' performance
e) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance
Mitch, I eliminated A & D because 'that' refers to experiments which is wrong.
However, I prefer E over B.
In B, can you please explain the role of 'that'? what it is? For me, if looks like that is a relative pronoun and the entire clause modifies 'effects' which is wrong I guess.

Also, can you say few words on 'would have' ? I know it is used for hypothetical conditions but would like to hear more from you.
In B, that changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance is a restrictive relative clause modifying the noun effects. What kind of effects? The effects that changes in working conditions would have. That is a relative pronoun referring to the noun effects.

One function of would is to express the future-in-the-past: an action expected to take place in the past after another past action.

...the effects that changes in working conditions were having...

In the example above, the tense of were having indicates that the changes and the effects happened contemporaneously (at the same time) in the past.

...the effects that changes in working conditions would have...

In the example above, the tense of would have indicates that the changes in working conditions happened first and that the effects were expected to happen later (but still in the past).

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1