BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT prep 2 _ CR

Expert replies
by joealam1 » Mon Sep 05, 2016 5:29 am
Many of Verbol Corporation's department heads will retire this year. The number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only half the expected vacancies. Verbol is not going to hire department heads from outside the company, have current department heads take over more than one department, or reduce the number of its departments. So some departments will be without department heads next year, since verbol will not ______________

A) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
B) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
C) have any managers who are currently senior to department heads serve as department heads
D) reduce the responsibilities of each department
E) reduce the average number of employees per department


OA:C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:01 am
Getting a CR question right often requires noticing a key detail.

The prompt here states the following.

- The number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only half the expected vacancies.

It also rules out various options for filling the vacancies that cannot be filled via promotion.

- No outside hiring.

- No having one person head multiple departments.

- No reducing departments.

Conclusion:

Some departments will be without department heads next year.

The blank has to be filled with something Verbol will not do, something such that should Verbol do it, all the departments would have heads.

Will Verbol not 3D print duplicate employees? Will Verbol not use robots as department heads? Let's go to the answer choices to see what Verbol will not do.

(A) We already know that there are not enough people to promote. So promoting more than one employee from some departments will not help, because doing so will not add to the number of people available for promotion to department head.

(B) Doing this would not add to the number of department heads. It would reduce the number of department heads.

(C) Ahah. Here is where the key detail comes in. Verbol may not have enough employees with qualifications for PROMOTION, but it may have employees who would not be promoted if they became department heads. Employees who are already senior to department heads would not be promoted in becoming department heads. So here is another thing that Verbol Corporation could do to increase the number of department heads. Therefore one could say that some departments will be without department heads next year, since, in addition to not doing those other things, Verbol will not have any managers who are currently senior to department heads serve as department heads.

(D) Reducing the responsibilities of departments does not reduce the need for department heads or add to the number of department heads.

(E) Reducing the number of employees per department might seem to reduce the need for department heads, but if you still have the same number of departments and still require the same qualifications for promotion to department head, you will still have departments without heads.

The correct answer is C.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion