Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT Official Guide 2019 More and more law firms

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jun 28, 2018 6:11 pm
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

More and more law firms specializing in corporate taxes are paid on a contingency-fee basis. Under this arrangement, if a case is won, the firm usually receives more than it would have received if it had been paid on the alternate hourly rate basis. If the case is lost, the firm receives nothing. Most firms are likely to make more under the contingency-fee arrangement.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the prediction above?

A. Firms that work exclusively under the hourly rate arrangement spend, on average, fewer hours on cases that are won than on cases that are lost.

B. Some litigation can last for years before any decision is reached, and, even then, the decision may be appealed.

C. Firms under the contingency-fee arrangement still pay their employees on an hourly basis.

D. Since the majority of firms specialize in certain kinds of cases, they are able to assess accurately their chances of winning each potential case.

E. Firms working under the contingency-fee arrangement take in fewer cases per year than do firms working under the hourly rate arrangement.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Jun 29, 2018 2:08 am
Option A - INCORRECT.
This prediction is wrong because, for a case to be won or loose you must have spent series of hours on the case which the ending can only ascertain the outcome. However this option does not strengthen the prediction on how to achieve more payment when you win a case.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This option maybe right but it is not accurately true pertaining the argument in this reasoning.

Option C - INCORRECT.
This option is not seen as the basics of the argument, as payment of employee on a hourly bases is not the reason why the contingency-fee is appropriated to cases won.

Option D - CORRECT.
This option has been able to strengthen the prediction of the argument. Since the majority of firms specialize in different kind of cases and firms specializing in corporate taxes is one of them, then it is possible for them to win more cases on tax issues since that is what they specialize on making the contingency-fee in their favor rather the hourly paid fees paid to the other firms who does not have specialty in such field.

Option E - INCORRECT.
This statement is possible but it is not predictable that firms not working under the contingency-fee will earn higher than firms that does have specialty and still work base on contingency-fee.
Join the discussion