BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Official Guide 2019 A study compared a sample

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jun 27, 2018 5:04 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

A study compared a sample of Swedish people older than 75 who needed in-home assistance with a similar sample of Israeli people. The people in the two samples received both informal assistance, provided by family and friends, and formal assistance, professionally provided. Although Sweden and Israel have equally well-funded and comprehensive systems for providing formal assistance, the study found that the people in the Swedish sample received more formal assistance, on average, than those in the Israeli sample.

Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the difference that the study found?


A. A companion study found that among children needing special in-home care, the amount of formal assistance they received was roughly the same in Sweden as in Israel.

B. More Swedish than Israeli people older than 75 live in rural areas where formal assistance services are sparse or nonexistent.

C. Although in both Sweden and Israel much of the funding for formal assistance ultimately comes from the central government, the local structures through which assistance is delivered are different in the two countries.

D. In recent decades, the increase in life expectancy of someone who is 75 years old has been greater in Israel than in Sweden.

E. In Israel, people older than 75 tend to live with their children, whereas in Sweden people of that age tend to live alone.
Last edited by BTGmoderatorDC on Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:12 am
In Option A - INCORRECT
This option has been unable to define the finding established in the speakers speech. Although the study acknowledge that both countries are well treated formally but it is favorable to one country than the other, which this statement does not refer to the children like it is represented in this option.

In Option B - INCORRECT.
This statement has wrongly stated the conclusion derived after the finding. The Swedish people who are over 75 years of age who live in the rural area have more formal assistance compared to the Israeli who live in the same area.

In Option C - CORRECT.
This statement has been able to define the conclusion derived in the study in a simple and appropriate form. The study showed that both country has a comprehensive system for providing formal assistance but Swedish has more formal assistance on the average than Israeli, due to the local structure handling each state is stronger than the other.

In Option D - INCORRECT.
This option is out of context with the study derived. The provision for assistance was not made based on the life expectancy of both state. The reason stated in this option was not stated in the speakers study.

In Option E - INCORRECT.
This option may be right, but this reason given was not stated in the study as a reason why Swedish has more formal assistance than the Israeli.
Join the discussion