BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat CR

Expert replies
by CITI29 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:02 pm
It is well known that human tears often serve to
moisten the eye, protect it from infection, and wash
away irritants; such tears are called irritant or reflex
tears. Dr. Field hypothesizes that emotional tears
have a different biological function. She suggests that
by shedding tears when under emotional stress people
excrete harmful chemicals that build up in such body
fluids as blood serum during emotional stress.

Each of the following, if true, provides some support
for Dr. Field’s hypothesis EXCEPT:
(A) The people most likely to cry when undergoing
emotional stress are less likely to suffer from stressrelated
diseases than is the population at large.
(B) If a local anesthetic is applied to the surface of
the eye, irritant and reflex tears are inhibited, but
emotional tears are not.
(C) The chemical composition of tears that are
induced by grit in the eye is identical to the
composition of tears induced by emotional Stress.
(D) The concentration of a substance that the body
produces only under conditions of emotional Stress is
thirty times greater in tears than in blood serum.
(E) Patients who suffer from a condition that pre
secretion of tears display a slower than normal
physiological recovery from emotional stress.

ans : 'c'..cldnt understand, pls explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:37 pm
C weakens the premise in the passage that compositon of tear to wash and protect eyes from irritant differ from that of tear to release emotional pressure.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by newera » Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:48 pm
C.

Hypothesis: Emotional tears are different than ordinary tears because they contain harmful stress related CHEMICALS. If this is true, technically, the chemical makeup of normal tears v emotional tears should be different. Because normal tears shouldn't contain this stress related chemical.

C suggests that both tears are identical. This weakens the scientist's hypothesis.
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:42 am
I am leaning more towards C, but I'm not sure about it.
Join the discussion