BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Confusing DS

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:52 am
Thanked: 1 times
by anandhimanshu85 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:09 am
If x > 0 , is x/y > x ?
(1) 0 < y < 1
(2) x > 1

OA: I answered it as D but the OA is given as A.Can anyone explain?
Last edited by anandhimanshu85 on Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:23 am
anandhimanshu85 wrote:If x > 0 , is yx > x ?
(1) 0 < y < 1
(2) x > 1

OA: I answered it as D but the OA is given as A.Can anyone explain?
This one's a great candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Since we are told that x is positive, we can take our original target questions (Is yx > x ?) and divide both sides by x to get the rephrased target question: Is y > 1?
Now let's check the statements.

Statement 1: 0 < y < 1
From this information, we can be certain that y is not greater than 1.
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > 1
From this information, we have no idea about whether y is greater than 1.
So, statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT

The answer is A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pmFollowed by: 140 members
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:28 am
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this.

Prompt:
If x > 0 , is yx > x?

We are told that x is a positive number, greater than zero, so in the inequality yx > x, we can divide both sides by x. That leaves us with y > 1. So, the question "yx > x?" is entirely equivalent to the question "y > 1?"

Statement #1: 0 < y < 1
This indeed tells us that y is not greater than one. We can give a definitive "no" answer to the prompt. Because we can give a definitive answer, this means we have sufficient information. Statement #1, by itself, is sufficient.

Statement #2: x > 1
Well, we already knew that x was greater than zero. This doesn't change much, and it doesn't give any new information about whether y is greater than 1 or not. Statement #2, by itself, is insufficient.

Answer = A

Does that make sense?

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:52 am
Thanked: 1 times

by anandhimanshu85 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:28 am
Hello Brent,

I am sorry, actually the question stem was not correct, can you please tak a look as I have modified the question stem...sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
Himanshu
Last edited by anandhimanshu85 on Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:52 am
Thanked: 1 times

by anandhimanshu85 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:34 am
Hello Mike,

I am sorry, actually the question stem was not correct, can you please tak a look as I have modified the question stem...sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
Himanshu
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this.

Prompt:
If x > 0 , is yx > x?

We are told that x is a positive number, greater than zero, so in the inequality yx > x, we can divide both sides by x. That leaves us with y > 1. So, the question "yx > x?" is entirely equivalent to the question "y > 1?"

Statement #1: 0 < y < 1
This indeed tells us that y is not greater than one. We can give a definitive "no" answer to the prompt. Because we can give a definitive answer, this means we have sufficient information. Statement #1, by itself, is sufficient.

Statement #2: x > 1
Well, we already knew that x was greater than zero. This doesn't change much, and it doesn't give any new information about whether y is greater than 1 or not. Statement #2, by itself, is insufficient.

Answer = A

Does that make sense?

Mike :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:42 am
anandhimanshu85 wrote:Hello Brent/Mike,

I am sorry, actually the question stem was not correct, can you please tak a look as I have modified the question stem...sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
Himanshu
Hi Himanshu,

The slight change to the original target question doesn't change much.

Since we are told that x is positive, we can take our original target question (Is x/y > x ?) and divide both sides by x to get the rephrased target question: Is 1/y > 1?

Now, under what circumstances is 1/y > 1?
Well, for this to hold true, it must be the case that 0 < y < 1.
In other words the inequality 1/y > 1 is equivalent to the inequality 0 < y < 1.

Given this, we can re-rephrase the target question as (Is 0 < y < 1 ?)

Now let's check the statements.

Statement 1: 0 < y < 1
From this information, we can be certain that 0 < y < 1
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > 1
From this information, we have no idea about whether or not 0 < y < 1 .
So, statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT

The answer is A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1