BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Club DS

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:40 am
Any statement taken by itself is obviously insufficient. Let's see if you get anything by combining their powers... If x = -z, that means that the arithmetic mean of x and z is zero, giving you y = 0. That is not sufficient however, since you don't know anything about the nature of x and z. They could be -3 and 3, 12345 and -12345 and so forth.

So E would be correct.
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:55 am
I do not understand why (1) is INSUFF

let x y z be consecutive
x, x+1, x+2
(x+x+2)/2 = x+1
this is actually stem (1)

(1) y equals to the arithmetic mean of x and z
Can you prove that it is INSUFF?

May be it is easy but I am stuck (((
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:10 pm
Let me just give you an example:
x = 2
y = 4
z = 6.

x+z = 8, so y is the arithmetic mean of x and z.
It is obvious that the three numbers are not consecutive, but still they respect rule 1.

The mistake you are making here is that you're seeing things the other way around. You do not start by knowing that x, y and z are consecutive, you need to get there. You should know that y being the mean of x and z does not necessarily mean that they're consecutive. They just have to be in an arithmetic progression.
Any numbers like these have y = mean of x and z:

a, a+b and a+2b, no matter what the values of a and b are.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:17 pm
- 1 0 1

-5 0 5

-1200 0 1200
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:51 am
Thank you
I made silly mistake :(
Join the discussion