Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAC Practice Exam DS question #4

Expert replies
by smar83 » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:47 pm
Please help me with this DS question ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by its_me07 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:44 am
Is the OA E?
Join the discussion

by smar83 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:31 am
yes it is E. I had to do lot of scratch work for this and decided to guess and ended up guessing wrong.

Can you please explain ?? I tried finding slopes of 2 lines, I guess one slope has to be -ve for the lines to be perpendicular.
Join the discussion

by its_me07 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:52 am
I can give it a try :D .
As question stem says that k and passes through (1,1) and (1,-1) thats means they intersect at x=1.They seeem to form vertical angles

ST 1 says that k and m intersect at (1,-1) which is exactly below that point.Nothing is said abt the angles as one shud be 90 for them to be perpendicular so INSUFF

ST 2 gives u a point for k and again nothing is said abt the angles it forms so INSUFF.

Similary when u combine these two ST no conclusion can be drawn.Hence E.

Any other suggestions are also welcome???
Join the discussion

by RyanDe680 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:48 am
its_me07 wrote:I can give it a try :D .
As question stem says that k and passes through (1,1) and (1,-1) thats means they intersect at x=1.They seeem to form vertical angles
I'm not sure if I understand the verticle angle point you have made. (correct grammar??) :lol:

Anyway, If you draw these out quickly, which I have, you have two points. You just dont know which way the lines may pass.

Statement 1: Lines interesect at (1, -1). This doesn't indicate still which way they run. They could be verticle, but one line could be horizontal, or it could run on an angle. This statement helps to tell where they intersect, but doesn't reveal any information about their actual shape. INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: Line k (with points (1, 1)) intersects the x-axis at point (1, 0). This tells us that line k extends down to the x-axis as point (1, 0), but doesn't give any information about line m or does it give any information about either line's actual shape. INSUFFICIENT.

Therefore, answer is E - Statements 1 & 2 together are not sufficient.
Ryan
Join the discussion

by its_me07 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:42 am
when lines are at right angle to each other then they said to be perpendicular thats why i used the word 'verticl angles'.

ANyways thx fro the explanation :)
Join the discussion