BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAC paper based tests

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bww » Sat May 12, 2007 2:42 pm
I think it's universally accepted that number lines run from negative to positive, going left to right, correct? Seems like a dumb question but I'm not sure if ETS suspects that we'll simply assume that.

BUT assuming that it's a traditional number line--horizontal, positive numbers to right side of zero and negative to the left--I think the answer here has to be A.

I) Given q=-s, q will always be negative s, i.e. q=-4 when s=4, q=-2.5 when s=2.5 and so forth. r is somewhere in between, and thus closest to zero. I) is sufficient.

II) Given -t<q, q will always be larger than the negative counterpart of t. So if t=5, q must be greater than -5. If t=1.23, q must be greater than -1.23. But we don't know how much greater. If -t=-2, q could be 1, in which case r is not closest to zero. II) is not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Sun May 13, 2007 5:20 am
I will go with A
Join the discussion