BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

George Bernard Shaw

Expert replies
by uptowngirl92 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:05 am
Could you provide a few lines of explanations?

George Bernard Shaw wrote: " That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity."

Shaw's statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?

A Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit
B Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population
C Grocers who raise the price of food in order to increase their profit margins
D Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market share
E Bakers and surgeons who earn a profit by supplying other peoples' basic needs
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by aj5105 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:59 am
I picked (A)
Join the discussion

Explanation

by turbo jet » Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:22 am
Choice A is the correct answer.

It is mimic the reasoning variety of question where the argument provides us a reasoning/logic. The logic may be correct/flawed.

We need to choose the answer choice that mimics/imitates the logic in the argument.

The best way to approach this problem would be to paraphrase the argument in your own words.

eg. Bernard Shaw in the second half of the sentence wants to convey that a person would do a task just for money and not because it is required/is a part of his profession.

We can see this same logic in Ans choice A. The other choices only talk about the 1st part of the logic i.e. "a person would do a task just for money" The other answer choices does not imitates the second part of the logic "not because it is required/is a part of his profession.". Hence they are incomplete.

Cheers!!
Turbo Jet
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:23 am
Dear uptowngirl, would request you to kindly also provide the answers hidden by a spoiler.

Thnx so much.
And good questions.

Keep posting

Cheers!!
Turbo Jet

:) :) :) :)
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:54 am
Are you an English major, turbo?


:shock:
Join the discussion

Re: George Bernard Shaw

by amazonviper » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:27 am
uptowngirl92 wrote:Could you provide a few lines of explanations?

George Bernard Shaw wrote: " That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity."

Shaw's statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?

A Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit
B Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population
C Grocers who raise the price of food in order to increase their profit margins
D Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market share
E Bakers and surgeons who earn a profit by supplying other peoples' basic needs

IMO A.
The key is understanding the crux of the passage. The passage as a whole implies a negative meaning. The logic is "just because we go with A we go with B too (B being pretty crazy and unnecessary)".
IMO only A seems to show that trend (negative impact). The rest of the option do not show that trend.

What is the OA???
Join the discussion

by yogami » Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
"That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity"

This language sounds so academic? Imagine Obama today giving a puiblic speech like this?
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:41 pm
aj5105 wrote:Are you an English major, turbo?


:shock:
Whoa!!! Far from that!! I am an economics and finance major !!! Way to go before i can claim to be an English major!!!
Join the discussion

by varundaga05 » Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:49 pm
still not clear

Can someone give some other explanation
Join the discussion

by varundaga05 » Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:58 pm
Reference : https://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-george-ber ... 76634.html

The question hisnges on the word pecuniary which means of or pertaining to money.

"That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you," this means bakers will only bake bread for you if it in there money making interests. Making bread is profitable.

"should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity." This means doctors interests in providing you medical attention is linked making them money and not becaue it is the right thing to do, so if cutting off your leg would make them more money then they would cut more legs off not because it medically necessary but becaus it is profitable, which is a sad commentary on human nature.

(B) Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population - This staes the doctor is motivated by money to specialize in certain diseases but it this does not mean he is motivated to misdiagnose

(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit - A goes to the heart of the matter perfoming medical procedures for the sake of profit and not medical need.
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:26 pm
It's equally needless to "perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit" (choice A) as it is to remove someone's leg for a price.
Join the discussion