BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

geneticist

Expert replies
by sumanr84 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:52 am
If a geneticist selects any arbitrary group of people - for instance, those who enjoy watching football games - and examines them closely enough, he or she may well find a genetic marker common to all of them. But that shared marker need not have anything to do with the fact that they all like football.

The consideration above can best serve as part of an argument against the view that

a. An individual's personality is more likely to be determined by the environment in which he grew up than by his or her genetic makeup.
b. The discovery that alcoholics share a common gene establishes that alcoholism is genetically determined.
c. Certain personality traits are determined neither by environment nor by heredity, but by some unknown third element.
d. Since genetic makeup may determine how one responds to one's environment, scientists cannot assume that heredity plays no role in personality development.
e. Certain personality traits can be reinforced by spending time with others who share that personality trait.

[spoiler]Source : kaplan cat2, OA later[/spoiler]
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:08 am
imo A is correct answer

ex in india all most all crazy about cricket. this does not means they are genetically all same
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:16 am
I also go with A.
Looks like a tough question to me. A,D are competitors according to me.
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 2:30 am
ya kvcpk i was also stuck between A and D but example of football force me to choose A.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:00 am
Guys..you picked the same answer as I picked, but A is wrong. Please give it a one more shot
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:47 am
sumanr84 wrote:Guys..you picked the same answer as I picked, but A is wrong. Please give it a one more shot
Hmmm.. now its time for lottery :D

I am looking at "against the view that " now...

So B looks better this time.. I am sure that I would get it wrong in main exam though.. :x
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:04 am
kvcpk wrote: Hmmm.. now its time for lottery :D

I am looking at "against the view that " now...

So B looks better this time.. I am sure that I would get it wrong in main exam though.. :x
Bingo !! Jack-Pot :-)
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:19 am
sumanr84 wrote:
kvcpk wrote: Hmmm.. now its time for lottery :D

I am looking at "against the view that " now...

So B looks better this time.. I am sure that I would get it wrong in main exam though.. :x
Bingo !! Jack-Pot :-)
Cant believe that I got it right this time.. I think i am getting used to GMAT way of answers.. hehehe
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:56 am
can any expert explain?

whats the source?
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:19 am
OE : Kaplan

This argument warns against jumping to a conclusion of false causality. The author points out that just because a group of people have something in common, they like football, for example, and they happen to share a genetic marker, it would be wrong to think that the genetic marker CAUSES them to like football. The question asks for the answer that disagrees with this line of thinking. (B) is correct because it takes the direct opposite stance and claims that a common gene discovered in alcoholics proves that alcoholism IS CAUSED by that gene. (A) is wrong because it is more consistent with this author's position since it claims that environment is more influential than genetic makeup in determining a person's personality. The author does not discuss environmental effects on personality but does seem to agree with the position that genetic makeup is not always the CAUSE of an observed characteristic. (C) also leans toward the author's position by stating that another element, other than environment or heredity, determines personality traits. For (D) to be correct, the stimulus would have to argue that scientists can assume that heredity plays no role in personality development. However, that's further than the stimulus actually goes, as the stimulus simply says that a shared genetic marker does not necessarily cause a given personality trait. (E) does not address the key issue in the argument - whether genetics does or does not determine a certain characteristic.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:07 am
sumanr84 wrote:OE : Kaplan

This argument warns against jumping to a conclusion of false causality. The author points out that just because a group of people have something in common, they like football, for example, and they happen to share a genetic marker, it would be wrong to think that the genetic marker CAUSES them to like football. The question asks for the answer that disagrees with this line of thinking. (B) is correct because it takes the direct opposite stance and claims that a common gene discovered in alcoholics proves that alcoholism IS CAUSED by that gene. (A) is wrong because it is more consistent with this author's position since it claims that environment is more influential than genetic makeup in determining a person's personality. The author does not discuss environmental effects on personality but does seem to agree with the position that genetic makeup is not always the CAUSE of an observed characteristic. (C) also leans toward the author's position by stating that another element, other than environment or heredity, determines personality traits. For (D) to be correct, the stimulus would have to argue that scientists can assume that heredity plays no role in personality development. However, that's further than the stimulus actually goes, as the stimulus simply says that a shared genetic marker does not necessarily cause a given personality trait. (E) does not address the key issue in the argument - whether genetics does or does not determine a certain characteristic.
Good one Suman.. Thanks for sharing!!
Join the discussion