BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gas-fired and oil-fired - Weaken

Expert replies
by sparkles3144 » Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:15 pm
Gas-fired and oil-fired power plants emit some pollutants into the air. However, coal-fired plants, as presently engineered, emit far more noxious air pollutants, causing acid rain to fall hundreds of miles away from the plants themselves. Therefore, in order to reduce air pollution, we should close down the coal-fired plants and replace them with gas and oil-fired plants.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

A. In addition to the air emissions from coal-fired power plants, mining coal can pollute water, while gas and oil-fired plants pollute only air.

B. Coal plants can easily be redesigned to eliminate most emissions into the atmosphere.

C. Gas-fired power plants are more cost efficient than coal-fired power plants.

D. As supplies of oil decline, the demand for natural gas and coal will increase.

E. Engineers have developed a model to reduce emissions from oil and gas-fired plants to an imperceptible amount.

Is it B?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:42 pm
Hi sparkles3144,

This CR question is an example of a WEAKEN question. We'll need to understand the logic behind the prompt and then find an answer that ATTACKS the logic.

The Facts:
-Gas-fired and Oil-fired power plants emit some air pollutants
-Coal-fired plants, at PRESENT, emit far MORE noxious air pollutants

The Conclusion:
-The REDUCE air pollution, we should close down Coal-fired plants and replace them with Gas-Fired and Oil-fired plants

The Logic:
Since the PRESENT version of Coal-fired plants cause so much MORE pollution (by comparison), if we want to REDUCE air pollution, we need to replace the Coal plants with Gas and Oil plants. This logic holds true if Coal plants can't be improved and if the other plants (Gas and Oil) don't cause some other kind of danger in other ways.

To WEAKEN the logic, we'll need an answer that either tells us that Coal plants can be improved to emit less pollution than Gas and Oil plants or that Gas and Oil plants cause other pollution that's worse than what Coal plants currently do.

The correct answer B explains how Coal plants can be improved (and their pollution significantly decreased).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:56 pm
Another approach:

To weaken an argument, you want to argue for the OPPOSITE conclusion.

If the conclusion of this argument is "Closing coal plants will reduce air pollution", we want to argue the opposite: "Closing coal plants MAY NOT reduce air pollution". So any answer that suggests this is fine.

A:: This tells us that coal plants are even worse than we thought - not at all what we want here!
B:: Hey, here's something telling us that coal plants aren't necessarily air polluters ... looks good.
C:: Cost-efficiency has nothing to do with air pollution, so this is out of scope.
D:: Demand is also out of scope.
E:: This would argue for the original conclusion, as it suggests that oil- and gas-fired plants pollute the air less than coal-fired plants do.

B it is!
Join the discussion