BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Furniture!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:30 am
Some communities in Florida are populated almost exclusively by retired people and contain few, if any, families with small children. Yet these communities are home to thriving businesses specializing in the rental of furniture for infants and small children.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the seeming discrepancy described above?

(A) The businesses specializing in the rental of children's furniture buy their furniture from distributors outside of Florida.
(B) The few children who do reside in these communities all know each other and often make overnight visits to one another's houses.
(C) Many residents of these communities who move frequently prefer renting their furniture to buying it outright.
(D) Many residents of these communities must provide for the needs of visiting grandchildren several weeks a year.
(E) Children's furniture available for rental is of the same quality as that available for sale in the stores.

[spoiler]OA: D[/spoiler]

Why NOT B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sirisha.g » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:51 am
even if they know each other, the overall number of children is same. hence, B is wrong
D says, old people(who are more in number) must provide facilities for their grandchildren who visit them(for several weeks in a year) hence they rent the furniture
Join the discussion

by scorpionz » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:52 am
gmat_perfect wrote:Some communities in Florida are populated almost exclusively by retired people and contain few, if any, families with small children. Yet these communities are home to thriving businesses specializing in the rental of furniture for infants and small children.


[spoiler]OA: D[/spoiler]

Why NOT B
D definitely seems the best option...

(A) The businesses specializing in the rental of children's furniture buy their furniture from distributors outside of Florida. Irrelevant
(B) The few children who do reside in these communities all know each other and often make overnight visits to one another's houses. This does not address why the rentals for furnitures for infants are thriving. Also, only if a few children reside in these communities, and if even hypothetically these kids do rent out furniture for such occasions rather than simply using the furniture at their friends' places, it cannot possible lead to a thriving business.
(C) Many residents of these communities who move frequently prefer renting their furniture to buying it outright. Was a little confused here, but then it clicked that this evidence only refers to "many residents" WHO move..It does not mean that many residents actually move but rather a major % of the residents who move..
(D) Many residents of these communities must provide for the needs of visiting grandchildren several weeks a year. This clearly addresses the discrepancy...MANY residents provide for visiting GRANDCHILDREN (includes infants as well as kids) for SEVERAL weeks by renting furniture. Hence the furniture rental business is thriving...
(E) Children's furniture available for rental is of the same quality as that available for sale in the stores. If this were the case, people would rather buy a piece of furniture than take it on rent.. Doesn't help...

Hope the explanation helps!!

Cheers!
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:29 am
Thanks for the explanation.
Join the discussion

by soudeh » Sun Apr 23, 2017 8:49 pm
scorpionz wrote:
gmat_perfect wrote:Some communities in Florida are populated almost exclusively by retired people and contain few, if any, families with small children. Yet these communities are home to thriving businesses specializing in the rental of furniture for infants and small children.


[spoiler]OA: D[/spoiler]

Why NOT B
D definitely seems the best option...



I love this type of explanations , all clear ...
thank you

(A) The businesses specializing in the rental of children's furniture buy their furniture from distributors outside of Florida. Irrelevant
(B) The few children who do reside in these communities all know each other and often make overnight visits to one another's houses. This does not address why the rentals for furnitures for infants are thriving. Also, only if a few children reside in these communities, and if even hypothetically these kids do rent out furniture for such occasions rather than simply using the furniture at their friends' places, it cannot possible lead to a thriving business.
(C) Many residents of these communities who move frequently prefer renting their furniture to buying it outright. Was a little confused here, but then it clicked that this evidence only refers to "many residents" WHO move..It does not mean that many residents actually move but rather a major % of the residents who move..
(D) Many residents of these communities must provide for the needs of visiting grandchildren several weeks a year. This clearly addresses the discrepancy...MANY residents provide for visiting GRANDCHILDREN (includes infants as well as kids) for SEVERAL weeks by renting furniture. Hence the furniture rental business is thriving...
(E) Children's furniture available for rental is of the same quality as that available for sale in the stores. If this were the case, people would rather buy a piece of furniture than take it on rent.. Doesn't help...

Hope the explanation helps!!

Cheers!
Join the discussion