BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

functions

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by vittalgmat » Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:57 am
Mohsin,
This has been answered before on this forum. Pls search.

thanks
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:59 am
You can solve this by inserting X and 1-X to each choices and waste your 4 minutes..or since the correct answer will be for all x!

You should use X =1 so 1-X will be 0

just compare the results with x=1 and X=0

this will eliminate A, B and C in 30 seconds!

D looks right but you cant test E with X=1

so just check E with some other alternatives , lets say X=2 and X=-1

and you will see that the answer choices are not the same..but hey I checked the D too with X=2 and X=-1 and ...well I am not sure about the the validity of D & E any more :shock:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:01 am
okay I found the original Q and yes it is D.
Attachments
gmat_prep_366.jpg
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

begging to plug numbers.

by simba12123 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:40 am
This question is begging to plug numbers in.

Plugging 2 into original equation and you get -1 as the target.

A yields -1 hence my answer choice.
B yields -3 no
C yields 3 no
D yields 1 no
E yields -2 no

So where am I going wrong? IMO QA IS A
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:47 am
the ans is D

just substitute 1-x in plce of x in all options
you will easily be ablr to remove all wrong

A
it will turn out to be x which is wrong

B
x^2 will give something like 2x which can not be removed so wrong

C
good choice
but -ve sign will create problem

D
OK

E
easy one
it will becme 1-x/x
Join the discussion

hmm

by simba12123 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:01 pm
I am trying your way, however, I am very apt to plug in numbers to bring about concrete answers. My brain is wired that way. I dont see how my answer is wrong!
Join the discussion

Re: hmm

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:07 pm
simba12123 wrote:I am trying your way, however, I am very apt to plug in numbers to bring about concrete answers. My brain is wired that way. I dont see how my answer is wrong!
For must be true questions, use numbers to prove that particular option is WRONG.
Join the discussion

Re: begging to plug numbers.

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:10 pm
simba12123 wrote:This question is begging to plug numbers in.

Plugging 2 into original equation and you get -1 as the target.

A yields -1 hence my answer choice.
Plugging 2 gives -1 as the answer
that means we need to prove that
f(2) = f(-1)

but what you are concluding it as
f(2) = -1
Which is wrong.



f(x) = 1-x
so
f(1-x)
=1-(1-x)
=x

remember
x ! f(x)
B yields -3 no
C yields 3 no
D yields 1 no
E yields -2 no

So where am I going wrong? IMO QA IS A
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:54 pm
Received a PM for detailed reply.
Here I go.............


I will try for option A, rest you do yourself and let me know if you want me to do those as well.


Method 1: Without numbers
we need to prove f(x) = f(1-x) for all x

A
f(x) = 1-x

now if f(1-x) is also equal to 1-x than I can say A is the answer.

Let me try
we know
f(x) = 1-x

substitute x by 1-x
f(1-x) = 1-(1-x) = 1-1+x = x

Now we know
f(x) = 1-x
and
f(1-x) = x
so f(x) != f(1-x)
hence A can not be the answer....


Method 2: With numbers
you choose x = 2
so f(2) = 1-2 = -1

now we need ot prove that
f(2) = f(1-2) ie
f(2) = f(-1) [what you are proving is f(2) = -1, which is not desired. We want f(2) to be equal to f(-1)]

now let me do
f(-1)
ie substitute x by -1 in f(x) = 1-x
f(-1) = 1-(-1) =2

hence
when x = 2
f(x) != f(1-x)
as f(2) is -1 and f(-1) is 2
so we can say A is incorrect.

Please do this for all other options, the concept will become clear to you.
Join the discussion

Aha

by simba12123 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Stop@800

I get it! I usually tend to make things more complex than they really are. I saw one step that was in my way of clarity. I thank you and stand correct. The main takeaway from this is not a mechanical error approach but more of a framing issue. I must step back before jumping into the computations to see what is really being asked. I am now one step closer to my 700. Thankyou
Join the discussion

Re: Aha

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:46 pm
simba12123 wrote:Stop@800

I get it! I usually tend to make things more complex than they really are. I saw one step that was in my way of clarity. I thank you and stand correct. The main takeaway from this is not a mechanical error approach but more of a framing issue. I must step back before jumping into the computations to see what is really being asked. I am now one step closer to my 700. Thankyou
True for everyoe.
Join the discussion