BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

From 1982 to 1987 sales of ..

Expert replies
by figs » Sun May 03, 2009 5:17 am
From 1982 to 1987 sales of new small boats increased between five and ten percent annually.

A. From 1982 to 1987 sales of new small boats increased between five and ten percent annually.

B. Five to ten percent is the annual increase in sales of new small boats in the years 1982 to 1987.

C.Sales of new small boats have increased annually five and ten percent in the years 1982 to 1987.

D.Annually an increase of five to ten percent has occurred between 1982 and 1987 in the sales of new small boats.

E.Occurring from 1982 to 1987 was an annual increase of five and ten percent in the sales of new small boats.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: From 1982 to 1987 sales of ..

by Vemuri » Sun May 03, 2009 5:26 am
IMO A.

Between X & Y is the correct idiomatic usage. This leaves us with A & D to focus on. In D, 5-10% has occurred between 1982 and 1987 is awkward construction. "A" is concise & clear.
Join the discussion

by figs » Sun May 03, 2009 7:57 am
OA:A
Join the discussion

Re: From 1982 to 1987 sales of ..

by sairakesh » Sun May 03, 2009 8:15 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO A.

Between X & Y is the correct idiomatic usage. This leaves us with A & D to focus on. In D, 5-10% has occurred between 1982 and 1987 is awkward construction. "A" is concise & clear.


Hi,
i did not understand the error in opt D.could you please elaborate
Join the discussion

Re: From 1982 to 1987 sales of ..

by rahulg83 » Sun May 03, 2009 8:52 am
sairakesh wrote:
Vemuri wrote:IMO A.

Between X & Y is the correct idiomatic usage. This leaves us with A & D to focus on. In D, 5-10% has occurred between 1982 and 1987 is awkward construction. "A" is concise & clear.


Hi,
i did not understand the error in opt D.could you please elaborate
If to choose between a concise and a wordy sentence, go for the concise one. That exactly A is..
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:03 am
why e is wrong here.

the tense in e is wrong?

pls explain
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:04 pm
Hey All,

Uh-oh. I don't like all this talk of concision. Nothing here is a concision issue. It's grammar!
From 1982 to 1987 sales of new small boats increased between five and ten percent annually.

A. From 1982 to 1987 sales of new small boats increased between five and ten percent annually.
B. Five to ten percent is the annual increase in sales of new small boats in the years 1982 to 1987.
C.Sales of new small boats have increased annually five and ten percent in the years 1982 to 1987.
D.Annually an increase of five to ten percent has occurred between 1982 and 1987 in the sales of new small boats.
E.Occurring from 1982 to 1987 was an annual increase of five and ten percent in the sales of new small boats.
(A) I'd want a comma after "from 1982 to 1987," but otherwise solid!

(B) Incorrect usage of the present tense. That was the annual increase back then!

(C) Incorrect usage of the present perfect tense. That tense requires the action to continue into the presence, but this action stops in 1987.

(D) Incorrect usage of the present perfect tense again. "in the sales of new boats" is idiomatically incorrect.

(E) "Occurring was" doesn't make any sense. "Five and ten percent" is totally illogical...it can't be both every year! "in the sales" is awkward.

Hope that helps!
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:57 pm
I understand why "of 5 and 10 percent" in e is wrong?

I do not understand why "occuring" in e is wrong. Pls, explain
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:15 am
It's redundant. If something "occurred," then by definition, it "was." You don't need to say both.

X occurred on Friday.

Occurring on Friday was X???

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1