Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Formulas for three-component set problems

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by amitdgr » Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:27 am
u = union and n = intersection

1. For 3 sets A, B, and C: P(AuBuC) : P(A) + P(B) + P(C) – P(AnB) – P(AnC) – P(BnC) + P(AnBnC)

2. To determine the No of persons in exactly one set : P(A) + P(B) + P(C) – 2P(AnB) – 2P(AnC) – 2P(BnC) + 3P(AnBnC)

3. To determine the No of persons in exactly two of the sets : P(AnB) + P(AnC) + P(BnC) – 3P(AnBnC)

4. To determine the No of persons in exactly three of the sets : P(AnBnC)

5. To determine the No of persons in two or more sets : P(AnB) + P(AnC) + P(BnC) – 2P(AnBnC)

6. To determine the No of persons in at least one set : P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AnB) - P(AnC) - P(BnC) + 2 P(AnBnC)

(SEE THE ATTACHED PICTURE TO UNDERSTAND THE BELOW MORE CLEARLY)

1. For three sets A, B, and C, P(AuBuC): (A+B+C+X+Y+Z+O)
2. Number of people in exactly one set: ( A+B+C)
3. Number of people in exactly two of the sets: (X+Y+Z)
4. Number of people in exactly three of the sets: O
5. Number of people in two or more sets: ( X+Y+Z+O)
6. Number of people only in set A: A
7. P(A): A+X+Y+O
8. P( AnB): X+O

Hope this helps. Please add if i have missed something.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Please visit my blog Gmat Tips and Strategies
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by beatthegmat » Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:20 am
Thanks so much for contributing this info!
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Join the discussion

by iambroke » Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:55 am
Thanks for the info, but I dont believe point 6 makes much sense...


No of persons in at least one set : P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AnB) - P(AnC) - P(BnC) + 2 P(AnBnC) = A+B+C+X+Y+Z+2O


So you're saying its > P(AUBUC)???

Please feel free to contradict or add any missing pieces....
Join the discussion

by stephen@knewton » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:54 am
I will let the OP address the question regarding point #6 above, which I suspect may be an innocent typo. But let me put in a very enthusiastic plug for the method which follows the all-caps line in that original post referring to the diagram.

I have found, almost without exception, that what has worked for many of my students (sometimes after a bit of arm-twisting) is to assign DIFFERENT variables to the total numbers of people within groups [here expressed as "P(A)" etc] and to each segment of the venn diagram.

For example, let's pretend we are doing a two-set overlap counting students taking Physics and Biology courses. We'll call the total number of students taking physics P, the total taking biology B, and assign additional variables as follows:

w = number taking ONLY physics
y = number taking ONLY bio
x = number taking BOTH (this is the football-shaped overlap of the venn diagram)
z = number taking NEITHER.

So, using those variables, we can express any total that we need:

P = w + x
B = y + x
PuB: x + y + z
PnB: x

And so on ...

Again, nothing WRONG with assigning only one set of variables and subtracting the overlaps, but I've found that the all-addition method tends to reduce unforced errors significantly. Just one instructor's two cents!

And yes, many thanks to amitdgr for the original post!

Cheers, Steve P.
Stephen
GMAT Instructor
Knewton Inc.
Join the discussion

by vivek.meka » Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:08 am
its X+Y+Z+A+B+C+O I THINK
Join the discussion