BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

forest first. why C is incorrect??

Expert replies
by seanceserene » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:38 am
The town of Enderton is located in an area where forest fires are quite common. During dry periods and periods of persistent winds, when even a spark can result in a fire that spreads over many acres, the danger of fire there is particularly serious. To help prevent forest fires in the area, the town government plans to post a ban on outdoor fires when such conditions prevail.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest indication that the town's plan will have at most a minor effect on the annual number of forest fires in the Enderton area?

A.Most of the tourists who visit the forests surrounding Enderton also visit Enderton itself.
B.Although there are county fire fighters available to combat forest fires in the area, Enderton itself has no professional fire fighters.
C.Very few forest fires in the Enderton area result from fires deliberately set by arsonists.
D.Nearly all forest fires in the Enderton area are the result of lightning strikes.
E.The number of forest fires in the Enderton area has not increased significantly in the last several years.


i think C is relevant and reasonable although the answer is D

please explain

thanks in advance
it is not an "alice in wonderland". it is real! i am going to freak GMAT out!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rockeyb » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:53 am
This is a strengthen question and we need to find an answer that will support the conclusion .

Conclusion :To help prevent forest fires in the area, the town government plans to post a ban on outdoor fires when such conditions prevail.

Lets look at answer options .

A.Most of the tourists who visit the forests surrounding Enderton also visit Enderton itself.
[How is tourist visiting relevant to fire , eliminate]
B.Although there are county fire fighters available to combat forest fires in the area, Enderton itself has no professional fire fighters.
[Another out of scope option , eliminate]
C.Very few forest fires in the Enderton area result from fires deliberately set by arsonists.
[Could be a contender , but remember we need to find the strongest evidence that the plan will have onlyleast amount of effect on the number of forest fires , lets look at other options][/color}
D.Nearly all forest fires in the Enderton area are the result of lightning strikes.
[All forest fires are result of lightning , so governments plan will have little or no effect on number of forest fires , Correct ]
E.The number of forest fires in the Enderton area has not increased significantly in the last several years.
[We are not concerned if the numbers have increased or decreased , eliminate]
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:31 am
This is a flaw question; it asks you to find the answer that shows that the town's solution will not actually fix the forest fire problem. The problem with C is the word "arsonists." Arson (setting fires with the intention of causing damage) is already illegal pretty much everywhere, as far as I know, so an arsonist would already be breaking the law, and would be unlikely to care about further government regulation banning outdoor fires. If C had said "tourists" or "campers" or something like that, it would be a good choice, but as it stands, D is the correct answer because it shows that the forest fires aren't generally being caused by people.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion