BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

for as conjunction: Interesting SC

Expert replies
by beastheart » Tue May 18, 2010 12:34 pm
The beautiful cello solo at the end of the symphony may have salvaged the performance, for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.

A- for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
B- in that most of the orchestra members performed throughout the two hour concert in a poor manner.
C- when most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
D- despite most of the orchestra members performing poorly throughout the two hour concert.
E- Even though most of the orchestra members made a poor performance throughout the two hour concert.

I chose "despite" as correct conjunction neglecting the verb form. Please comment and share examples if you have seen "for" like other awkard conjunctions in past ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sumanr84 » Tue May 18, 2010 9:09 pm
"FOR" is also used as subordinating conjunction to join two independent clauses;thereby, fixing the COMMA SPLICE error along with (AND, OR, BUT,NOR,YET, SO - ANBOYS for short)

FOR is generally preferred over IN THAT ( Refer OG 11 - Q : 51 )

FOR means 'because'
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by phelps » Tue May 18, 2010 11:31 pm
can you please provide OA
Join the discussion

by beastheart » Wed May 19, 2010 7:04 am
phelps wrote:can you please provide OA
A
Join the discussion

by T11 » Wed May 19, 2010 9:41 am
Hi,


You might find this link useful.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2010/05/ ... -sc-errors


T11
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Join the discussion

by sakali » Wed May 19, 2010 3:01 pm
Thanks all, for the clear explanations.

Pretty useful to remember the FANBOYS rule.

From what I gather...words like because, despite, etc. can never follow a comma and act as a coordinating conjunction. Correct?
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Wed May 19, 2010 7:19 pm
I think in this question despite would have made more sense than for
I real villian seems to be that comma rather than comparision between despite and for....

even in for means because,if we go for the whole meaning of sentence,
it is not that the .....performance was ....salvaged because others didnt performed well

i think the sentence means....
the performance was..... salvaged finally though.....others didnt performed well
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Fri May 21, 2010 3:31 am
frank1 wrote:I think in this question despite would have made more sense than for
I real villian seems to be that comma rather than comparision between despite and for....

even in for means because,if we go for the whole meaning of sentence,
it is not that the .....performance MAY ....salvaged because others didnt performed well

i think the sentence means....
the performance was..... salvaged finally though.....others didnt performed well
the sentence says "cello solo may have salvaged the performance" ie he/she predicts
y predicts ?
for( Because ) most of the orchestra member performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Fri May 21, 2010 8:16 pm
ok
the meaning of the word made a huge difference here
salvage - property or goods saved from damage or destruction
salvage - save from ruin, destruction, or harm

so i took it in case of ....'saved'....
any way GMAT was not that harsh on word meaning
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:17 pm
beastheart wrote:The beautiful cello solo at the end of the symphony may have salvaged the performance, for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.

A- for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
B- in that most of the orchestra members performed throughout the two hour concert in a poor manner.
C- when most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
D- despite most of the orchestra members performing poorly throughout the two hour concert.
E- Even though most of the orchestra members made a poor performance throughout the two hour concert
Can any of you explain what is wrong with D/E?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1