BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Food manufacturers can label a food product "Low Fat&qu

Expert replies
by vinni.k » Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:24 am
Food manufacturers can label a food product "Low Fat" if the products fat content is less than 3 grams. A nutritionist objects to this practice. She claims that consumers that mistake "low fat" to mean healthy, and therefore eat products that can still contribute to health problems. If food manufacturers could not put such labels on their products, consumers would have more incentive to investigate food products,and thus would be able to determine which products are truly healthy.

The nutritionist argument relies on which of the following assumptions ?

A) A food low in fat can still be high in cholesterol.

B) Most consumers buy a variety of food products ranging in fat content.

C) People predisposed to heart disease have to be very careful selecting what foods they eat.

D) Most supermarkets have sections dedicated to health foods.

E) Food consumers are capable of determining which foods are healthy.

OA is E

You might surely get the answer as i got it, however i am not able to find the right conclusion. In the argument i can see "claim", "therefore", and "thus". Which one is the conclusion ? Please help to find the conclusion.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by OptimusPrep » Sat Jul 25, 2015 7:09 pm
vinni.k wrote:Food manufacturers can label a food product "Low Fat" if the products fat content is less than 3 grams. A nutritionist objects to this practice. She claims that consumers that mistake "low fat" to mean healthy, and therefore eat products that can still contribute to health problems. If food manufacturers could not put such labels on their products, consumers would have more incentive to investigate food products,and thus would be able to determine which products are truly healthy.


You might surely get the answer as i got it, however i am not able to find the right conclusion. In the argument i can see "claim", "therefore", and "thus". Which one is the conclusion ? Please help to find the conclusion.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
The right conclusion is "the consumers would investigate food if the labels are not there and thus can determine the healthy food"
Here "claim" is used to tell you the reasoning of nutritionist and "therefore" is used to tell the effect of the claim.

"Thus" is linked to the conclusion here.
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:18 am
thank you ankur

Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:50 pm
Answer is E.
conclusion - if there is no label then consumers will investigate the food quality.

assumption- consumers know how to evaluate the quality.
Join the discussion