Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Flaw in Logic/ Weakening

Expert replies
by turbo jet » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:50 pm
In criminal proceedings, defense attorneys occasionally attempt to establish that a suspect was not present at the commission of a crime by comparing the suspect’s DNA to the DNA of blood or hair samples taken from the scene of the crime. Although every person’s DNA is unique, DNA tests often fail to distinguish among DNA samples taken from distinct individuals. Hence, it is a mistake to exonerate a suspect simply because that person’s DNA did not match the DNA samples taken
from the scene of the crime.

Which one of the following is an error in the reasoning
above?
(A) It assumes without warrant that the use of physical evidence in identifying suspects is never mistaken.

(B) It confuses a test that incorrectly identifies DNA samples as coming from the same person with a test that incorrectly shows as coming from
different persons samples that come from a single person.

(C) It generalizes about the reliability of all methods used to identify those involved in the commission of a crime on the basis of results
that pertain to only a few such methods.

(D) It relies on experimental data derived from DNA testing that have not been shown to hold under nonexperimental conditions.

(E) It fails to demonstrate that physical evidence taken from the scene of a crime is the only sort of evidence that should be admitted in criminal
court proceedings.

[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]
Last edited by turbo jet on Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:34 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vinaynp » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:20 pm
Just because a test fail to distinguish among DNA samples taken from distinct individuals doesn't mean that it says the DNA samples are same.

Hence IMO B)
Join the discussion

by ST » Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:26 am
which level this question belog? just wondering......
Join the discussion

by Sprite_TM » Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:40 pm
i think E - author assumes that DNA is the only evidence to convict someone

A, B, - unrelated
C OOS
D OOS
Join the discussion

by aspirant_gmat » Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:20 am
is B the correct answer?
Join the discussion

by pops » Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:47 am
I am wondering for this part of the question:
"Which one of the following is an error in the reasoning above?"
Join the discussion

by aspirant_gmat » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:28 am
The author has reached to the conclusion: "Hence, it is a mistake to exonerate a suspect simply because that person’s DNA did not match the DNA samples taken from the scene of the crime."

Now, the questions is asking us to find the wrong reasoning the author has used to reach to the conclusion by considering the given facts (In criminal proceedings, defence attorneys occasionally attempt to establish that a suspect was not present at the commission of a crime by comparing the suspect’s DNA to the DNA of blood or hair samples taken from the scene of the crime. Although every person’s DNA is unique, DNA tests often fail to distinguish among DNA samples taken from distinct individuals).
Join the discussion

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 11:03 pm
I would go with option B
Join the discussion