BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Flagrant Fouls

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:22 pm
Officials of the Youth Hockey League and parents of players in the league have become concerned with the number of flagrant fouls occurring during league games. This past season, the number of flagrant fouls was double the number from the season before. League officials plan to reduce the number of such fouls during the coming season by implementing mandatory suspensions for players who commit flagrant fouls.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the officials' plan will be effective?

a) Most serious injuries occurring during league games are a direct result of flagrant fouls.

b) League referees have been trained to recognize flagrant fouls and to report incidents involving such fouls.

c) Parents of players in the league are in support of mandatory suspensions for flagrant fouls.

d) A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.

e) Most players in the league strive to be selected for the All-Star team, and league rules state that no player with a record of suspension shall be selected for the All-Star team.

[spoiler]Pls help why "d" is wrong. This is from MGMAT-1, OA is "e".[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatsamurai » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:32 pm
imskpwr wrote:Officials of the Youth Hockey League and parents of players in the league have become concerned with the number of flagrant fouls occurring during league games. This past season, the number of flagrant fouls was double the number from the season before. League officials plan to reduce the number of such fouls during the coming season by implementing mandatory suspensions for players who commit flagrant fouls.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the officials' plan will be effective?

a) Most serious injuries occurring during league games are a direct result of flagrant fouls.

b) League referees have been trained to recognize flagrant fouls and to report incidents involving such fouls.

c) Parents of players in the league are in support of mandatory suspensions for flagrant fouls.

d) A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.

e) Most players in the league strive to be selected for the All-Star team, and league rules state that no player with a record of suspension shall be selected for the All-Star team.

[spoiler]Pls help why "d" is wrong. This is from MGMAT-1, OA is "e".[/spoiler]

Basically ill share with you, how my choices boiled down to E. I am not sure if it the the ideal approach but Voila-

A, C: Irrelevant
B, D and E:
B: Just because referees have been trained doesn't mean that the number of flagrant fouls will decrease. I mean if the training and reporting of flagrant foul was a problem, this issue would have never come up in the first place since flagrant fouls would have been low :D
D: Just like on GMAT Strategy works for you doesn't mean it'll work for me
E: If someones career and ambition is at stake, one will make sure to play by the rules.
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:03 am
straight E
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 am
imskpwr wrote:Officials of the Youth Hockey League and parents of players in the league have become concerned with the number of flagrant fouls occurring during league games. This past season, the number of flagrant fouls was double the number from the season before. League officials plan to reduce the number of such fouls during the coming season by implementing mandatory suspensions for players who commit flagrant fouls.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the officials' plan will be effective?

a) Most serious injuries occurring during league games are a direct result of flagrant fouls.

b) League referees have been trained to recognize flagrant fouls and to report incidents involving such fouls.

c) Parents of players in the league are in support of mandatory suspensions for flagrant fouls.

d) A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.

e) Most players in the league strive to be selected for the All-Star team, and league rules state that no player with a record of suspension shall be selected for the All-Star team.

[spoiler]Pls help why "d" is wrong. This is from MGMAT-1, OA is "e".[/spoiler]
This CR links MANDATORY SUSPENSIONS to a REDUCTION in the number of FLAGRANT FOULS.

The correct answer must show why suspensions will lead to a reduction in the number of fouls.

Answer choice E: Most players in the league strive to be selected for the All-Star team, and league rules state that no player with a record of suspension shall be selected for the All-Star team.
This answer choice explains why the proposed penalty will have the desired effect: since most players want to be on the All-Star team, and a player with a record of suspension is automatically disqualified, imposing mandatory suspensions for flagrant fouls is likely to lead to a reduction in the number of flagrant fouls.

The correct answer is E.

Please note that D can be eliminated because it does not indicate that suspensions in the other league CAUSED A REDUCTION in the number of fouls. It is entirely possible that the incidence of flagrant fouls in the other league has always been low -- that there has been no REDUCTION -- or that SOMETHING ELSE is responsible for the relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:51 am
yes, Mitch this is the right reasoning to decline D.

D says that another league also suspends and the league has lower rate of fouls but it doesn't mean that the rule of suspension has caused the lower rate of fouls, there may be other reasons.
Join the discussion