can you identify the conclusion of GMAT OG 11th Ed, CR Q No. 56 page 484. For the ease of the reader, i am copying the same argument below.
social scientists are underrepresented on the advisory councils of the NIH. since these councils advise NIH directors and recommend policy, the under-representation of social scientists result in a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences.
while reading MGMAT CR and RC guide, i've found that they claim that this argument is without any conclusion. to me the last line (the under-representation of social scientists result in a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences) seemed to be the conclusion. could you please tell me why this is not the conclusion?
thanks in advance.
social scientists are underrepresented on the advisory councils of the NIH. since these councils advise NIH directors and recommend policy, the under-representation of social scientists result in a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences.
while reading MGMAT CR and RC guide, i've found that they claim that this argument is without any conclusion. to me the last line (the under-representation of social scientists result in a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences) seemed to be the conclusion. could you please tell me why this is not the conclusion?
thanks in advance.
