Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Financial Forecaster

Expert replies
by Sprite_TM » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:15 pm
1. Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?



A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top manage­ment would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

(A) Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.

(B) Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.

(C) The advertisement is placed where those who will be likely to read it are millionaires.

(D) The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.

(E) Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thought » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:27 pm
IMO, this is a pretty easy question.

The advertiser's argument goes like this:

Because 1/3rd of subscribers is a millionaire and over 1/2 are in top management, (therefore) you should subscribe to Financial Forecaster now.

The argument implies (or invites the conclusion) that FF has had a role in the success of the current subscribers. So a reader would subscribe if they believe that FF causes you to be a millionaire/be in top management.

(A) Wrong. The reader might believe this but the advertisement doesn't explicitly or implicitly mention this.
(B) Wrong. Again, the reader might believe this but the advertisement doesn't explicitly or implicitly mention this.
(C) Wrong. Very Wrong. If the reader believes this he/she probably wouldn't subscribe. (The reader will believe that the advertisement is misleading.)
(D) Correct. This is the implication of the argument. Reading FF caused/helped the subscribers to become millionaires or join top management.
(E) Wrong. If the reader believes this he/she probably wouldn't subscribe. (The reader might believe that the argument is misleading and/or doesn't apply to him/her.)
Join the discussion

by Sprite_TM » Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:42 pm
thanks for the explanation
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sun May 15, 2016 2:17 am
I agree with OA
Join the discussion