BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Financial Forecaster

Expert replies
by Sprite_TM » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:15 pm
1. Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?



A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top manage­ment would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

(A) Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.

(B) Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.

(C) The advertisement is placed where those who will be likely to read it are millionaires.

(D) The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.

(E) Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thought » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:27 pm
IMO, this is a pretty easy question.

The advertiser's argument goes like this:

Because 1/3rd of subscribers is a millionaire and over 1/2 are in top management, (therefore) you should subscribe to Financial Forecaster now.

The argument implies (or invites the conclusion) that FF has had a role in the success of the current subscribers. So a reader would subscribe if they believe that FF causes you to be a millionaire/be in top management.

(A) Wrong. The reader might believe this but the advertisement doesn't explicitly or implicitly mention this.
(B) Wrong. Again, the reader might believe this but the advertisement doesn't explicitly or implicitly mention this.
(C) Wrong. Very Wrong. If the reader believes this he/she probably wouldn't subscribe. (The reader will believe that the advertisement is misleading.)
(D) Correct. This is the implication of the argument. Reading FF caused/helped the subscribers to become millionaires or join top management.
(E) Wrong. If the reader believes this he/she probably wouldn't subscribe. (The reader might believe that the argument is misleading and/or doesn't apply to him/her.)
Join the discussion

by Sprite_TM » Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:42 pm
thanks for the explanation
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sun May 15, 2016 2:17 am
I agree with OA
Join the discussion