BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

few HOT and few NOT

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm
There are cookies in a plate, few HOT and few NOT. A child each time randomly picks a single cookie out from the plate and eats it if it's HOT, or leaves the plate forever if it's NOT. What is the probability that the child will be able to eat at least 3 cookies before leaving the plate forever?

(1) Probability that child won't be able to eat any cookie before leaving the plate forever is 8/15.

(2) Probability that the child will be able to eat at least 2 cookies before leaving the plate forever is 11/15.








[spoiler]The label "few HOT and few NOT" clicked in mind this morning only, while doing a bathroom concert. Ardently, decided to make a question titled that. How is it? Don't know. In fact, haven't even given a single shot to it till now. Be first to tell what's wrong in it.[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:23 am
sanju09 wrote:There are cookies in a plate, few HOT and few NOT. A child each time randomly picks a single cookie out from the plate and eats it if it's HOT, or leaves the plate forever if it's NOT. What is the probability that the child will be able to eat at least 3 cookies before leaving the plate forever?

(1) Probability that child won't be able to eat any cookie before leaving the plate forever is 8/15.

(2) Probability that the child will be able to eat at least 2 cookies before leaving the plate forever is 11/15.








[spoiler]The label "few HOT and few NOT" clicked in mind this morning only, while doing a bathroom concert. Ardently, decided to make a question titled that. How is it? Don't know. In fact, haven't even given a single shot to it till now. Be first to tell what's wrong in it.[/spoiler]
____________________
Statement 1:-It means that the first cookie that the child picks is a NOT cookie.
Hence the ratio of NOT:HOT = 8:7 (since 8/15 is the probability)
Now,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie+2cookies)
P(0 cookie)=8/15 [1 NOT]
P(1 cookie)=(7/15)*(8/14) [1 HOT,1 NOT]
P(2 cookies)=(7/15)*(6/14)*(8/13) [1 HOT,1 HOT ,1 NOT]
Hence,the answer can be arrived at using the upper equation.

Statement 2:1-[P(0) + P(1)]=P[at least 2 cookies]=11/15
Now,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie+2cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie)-P(2cookies)
=11/15-P(2 cookies)
When we consider the no. of NOT COOKIES=x and HOT COOKIES=y,we arrive at a biquadratic equation .
[(x^2+2xy-x)]/[(x+y)(x+y-1)]=4/15
Join the discussion

by ajith » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:39 am
sanju09 wrote:There are cookies in a plate, few HOT and few NOT. A child each time randomly picks a single cookie out from the plate and eats it if it's HOT, or leaves the plate forever if it's NOT. What is the probability that the child will be able to eat at least 3 cookies before leaving the plate forever?

(1) Probability that child won't be able to eat any cookie before leaving the plate forever is 8/15.

(2) Probability that the child will be able to eat at least 2 cookies before leaving the plate forever is 11/15.








[spoiler]The label "few HOT and few NOT" clicked in mind this morning only, while doing a bathroom concert. Ardently, decided to make a question titled that. How is it? Don't know. In fact, haven't even given a single shot to it till now. Be first to tell what's wrong in it.[/spoiler]
IMO, E
Since neither 1 or 2 will help us determine the number of HOT and NOT buns
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:44 am
IMO, E
Since neither 1 or 2 will help us determine the number of HOT and NOT buns
When we set up two different equations in two variables, we sometime don't get to a unique set of answers. I'm not sure what has happened in this case.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:27 am
ajith wrote:
sanju09 wrote:There are cookies in a plate, few HOT and few NOT. A child each time randomly picks a single cookie out from the plate and eats it if it's HOT, or leaves the plate forever if it's NOT. What is the probability that the child will be able to eat at least 3 cookies before leaving the plate forever?

(1) Probability that child won't be able to eat any cookie before leaving the plate forever is 8/15.

(2) Probability that the child will be able to eat at least 2 cookies before leaving the plate forever is 11/15.








[spoiler]The label "few HOT and few NOT" clicked in mind this morning only, while doing a bathroom concert. Ardently, decided to make a question titled that. How is it? Don't know. In fact, haven't even given a single shot to it till now. Be first to tell what's wrong in it.[/spoiler]
IMO, E
Since neither 1 or 2 will help us determine the number of HOT and NOT buns
____________________________-
I doubt that,ajith.
Just see the solution posted by me above.
Using only the statement 1,I have arrived at the solution.
Hence,E is definitely not the answer.

Taken from my solution:-""Now,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie+2cookies)
P(0 cookie)=8/15 [1 NOT]
P(1 cookie)=(7/15)*(8/14) [1 HOT,1 NOT]
P(2 cookies)=(7/15)*(6/14)*(8/13) [1 HOT,1 HOT ,1 NOT]
Hence,the answer can be arrived at using the upper equation.""

Hence,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-[(8/15) + ((7/15)*(8/14)) + ((7/15)*(6/14)*(8/13))].
Join the discussion

by ajith » Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:31 am
harsh.champ wrote: Statement 1:-It means that the first cookie that the child picks is a NOT cookie.
Hence the ratio of NOT:HOT = 8:7 (since 8/15 is the probability)
Now,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie+2cookies)
P(0 cookie)=8/15 [1 NOT]
P(1 cookie)=(7/15)*(8/14) [1 HOT,1 NOT]

P(2 cookies)=(7/15)*(6/14)*(8/13) [1 HOT,1 HOT ,1 NOT]
Hence,the answer can be arrived at using the upper equation.

Statement 2:1-[P(0) + P(1)]=P[at least 2 cookies]=11/15
Now,P(at least 3 cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie+2cookies)=1-P(0 cookie+1 cookie)-P(2cookies)
=11/15-P(2 cookies)
When we consider the no. of NOT COOKIES=x and HOT COOKIES=y,we arrive at a biquadratic equation .
[(x^2+2xy-x)]/[(x+y)(x+y-1)]=4/15
You assume that there is only 15 cookies - what is this assumption based on?

See the colored portion
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion