Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

FEDERAL TAX ON A PACK OF CIGARETTES... Assumption Question

Expert replies
by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:13 am
In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?

A. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.

B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.

C. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.

D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.

E. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.
--------------------------------------

Please provide insights on this question.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by NSNguyen » Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:48 am
B is my choice
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:25 am
in my opinion..

It has to be inbetween A and D...


is it D??
Join the discussion

annakool1009 wrote:In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?

A. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.

B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.

C. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.

D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.

E. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.
--------------------------------------

Please provide insights on this question.

IMO D. If the cig price dropped by more than $.08 cents, it would offsett the increase due to tax. Let's just say if it dropped by $.50 which would make the new cig price $.42 cents cheaper. if cigs are cheaper and the sales are going down, tax increase has no effect on the demand.
thus, D is needed to make the conclusion.
Join the discussion

so what's the OA?

by ska7945 » Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:17 pm
I am in between b & d.
so what's OA?
anybody?
let's beat GMAT.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:10 pm
I feel A & D are the strong contenders.

I choose D .
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:59 pm
Hi annakool1009,
Could you post OA?
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:03 am
A or D, and I choose D. OA?
Join the discussion

by Jason11 » Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:26 pm
D.

Let's talk about the two-year period between 2007 and 2008.
Actually, the pretax of the following year is the value added tax price of the prior year. Look at the chart below:

I negate the choice D,

.........Years......2007......2008

..........Pretax.......90...........100
....Added Tax.....100...........108
Tax Increase...10 cent.......8 cent

So If the choice D is wrong or you negate it, then the sales of cigarette wouldn't be related to the tax price. Because the tax increase of the prior year would be higher than that of the following year as it is chart above.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Thu May 12, 2016 12:39 pm
Looking at it now, D makes sense
Join the discussion