Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Federal Income Tax

Expert replies
by vinay1983 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:59 pm
Hi there, seems that you have posted this in SC rather than in CR. I have flagged the post to be moved to CR.

This CR is on these lines.

Wealthy Individuals=======Donation====Tax deduction

New law/rule====no tax deduction on donation

Conclusion===Such institutions would be closed or be reduced in activity.

Here is what I feel it should have been

Option D has the strong word "only". we are not told about this

Option E Irrelevant

Option C Again Out of Scope

So I had it between A and B

Only reason I went for A, it gives a "balanced" idea as to what might happen to the donations from the wealthy individuals. See usage of many and some and NOT ALL. So it is safe.

Then I realized that B also has this strong word"only". It is confusing though, but are we told or is it safe to assume this?Strong words are to be taken with a pinch of salt, always!

Aside: Don't you think the federal government must have thought this over. If the donations to such institutions were through such wealthy people then by passing new tax laws, these institutions would definitely closed.No government would do such things!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ani781 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:38 am
Thanks Vinay.
I think the major determinant apart from extreme "only" is the imbalance that exists between 'some' and 'many'.
While 'some' orgs & institutions will get their doors closed, as stated in the argument(by completely running dry of money, as they might have been 100% patronized by these wealthy tax payers) ... B mentions for "many" the only source of funding was the tax payers' donations.

Thanks.
Join the discussion