BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Federal Income Tax

Expert replies
by vinay1983 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:59 pm
Hi there, seems that you have posted this in SC rather than in CR. I have flagged the post to be moved to CR.

This CR is on these lines.

Wealthy Individuals=======Donation====Tax deduction

New law/rule====no tax deduction on donation

Conclusion===Such institutions would be closed or be reduced in activity.

Here is what I feel it should have been

Option D has the strong word "only". we are not told about this

Option E Irrelevant

Option C Again Out of Scope

So I had it between A and B

Only reason I went for A, it gives a "balanced" idea as to what might happen to the donations from the wealthy individuals. See usage of many and some and NOT ALL. So it is safe.

Then I realized that B also has this strong word"only". It is confusing though, but are we told or is it safe to assume this?Strong words are to be taken with a pinch of salt, always!

Aside: Don't you think the federal government must have thought this over. If the donations to such institutions were through such wealthy people then by passing new tax laws, these institutions would definitely closed.No government would do such things!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ani781 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:38 am
Thanks Vinay.
I think the major determinant apart from extreme "only" is the imbalance that exists between 'some' and 'many'.
While 'some' orgs & institutions will get their doors closed, as stated in the argument(by completely running dry of money, as they might have been 100% patronized by these wealthy tax payers) ... B mentions for "many" the only source of funding was the tax payers' donations.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1