BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:16 pm
Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for home use, owners of stores that sell video games lobbied for protective legislation. Citing as a precedent legislation that postpones home film rentals until one year after general release to theaters, the video sellers proposed as an equitable solution a plan that would postpone rental of any video game until it had been available for sale for one year.

Which of the following, if true, would support an objection by owners of video rental stores that the fairness of the proposed legislation is not supported by the precedent cited?

A)Although the daily rental fee for home use of films is generally the same as that for video games, the average rental period for a video game is longer than that for a film.
B)Film rentals for home use tend to particularly strong during the first year after a film has been made available for both sale and rental at video rental stores.
C)Most people are interested in playing only the latest video games and tend to find video games that have been available for over a year unappealing whether they have played them before or not, whereas films maintain their appeal far longer after their release.
D)People who rent video games tend to play them by themselves, whereas people who rent films invite friends and neighbors to watch.
E)A slight decline in revenues from films that have been recently released in theaters has been attributed to the growing market for rentals of films for home use.

OA:C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by OptimusPrep » Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:04 pm
NandishSS wrote:Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for home use, owners of stores that sell video games lobbied for protective legislation. Citing as a precedent legislation that postpones home film rentals until one year after general release to theaters, the video sellers proposed as an equitable solution a plan that would postpone rental of any video game until it had been available for sale for one year.

Which of the following, if true, would support an objection by owners of video rental stores that the fairness of the proposed legislation is not supported by the precedent cited?

A)Although the daily rental fee for home use of films is generally the same as that for video games, the average rental period for a video game is longer than that for a film.
B)Film rentals for home use tend to particularly strong during the first year after a film has been made available for both sale and rental at video rental stores.
C)Most people are interested in playing only the latest video games and tend to find video games that have been available for over a year unappealing whether they have played them before or not, whereas films maintain their appeal far longer after their release.
D)People who rent video games tend to play them by themselves, whereas people who rent films invite friends and neighbors to watch.
E)A slight decline in revenues from films that have been recently released in theaters has been attributed to the growing market for rentals of films for home use.

OA:C
We need to find the option that supports the case of the Rental stores and say that the rental option that works for the movies will not work for the games.

Option C does just the same by saying that the people are not interested a game which is one year old. Hence by the time, the rental stores will have the permission to rent the games, they will become obsolete.

All the other options do not deal with the problem at hand.

Correct option: C
Join the discussion