BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Fat Intake

Expert replies
by Juggernaut_86 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:17 pm
A recent study demonstrated that parents living with children consume nearly five more grams of fat per day, on average, than do adults living without children. The higher fat intake among these parents is probably attributable to their snacking on the pizza and cookies that tend to be plentiful in households with children.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken this explanation of the parents' higher fat intake?

A) On average, households with children spend $15 more per week on pizza and cookies than do households without children.

B) Households with children purchase much more whole milk, which has a high fat content, than do households without children.

C) Children consume most of the pizza and cookies in any given household.

D) Parents ought to set a good example for their children, in dietary choices as in other matters.

E) Not all parents living with children consume more grams of fat than do adults living without children.


I am confused b/w B and C.

My reasoning - C correct
Since most of the pizza and cookies are consumed by the children, very less pizza and cookies are consumed by the parents. So actually, the amount of pizza and cookies that the parents consume could actually be the same as the amount of pizza and cookies that adults with no children could consume.

B - Incorrect
Households with children purchase much more whole milk but this does not tell me that the parents end up consuming any of that milk. So how can I attribute the higher fat intake to the purchase of whole milk?

OA is B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sam2304 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:20 pm
Higher fat intake by parents is cuz of pizzas and cookies
A.Amt of spending is irrelevant
B.Provides alternate reason which weakens the conclusion that it is not because of pizzas and cookies.
C.Children consuming more pizzas doesn't weaken the fact that fat intake is cuz of pizzas. Small amt of pizza consumption by parents also might be reason for increase in fat. So this doesn't weaken.
D.Doesn't weaken
E.Doesn't weaken
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by cans » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:20 pm
Premise: parents consume more fat than adults without children
Conclusion: more fat is because of pizza/cookies.
weaken:
A) if parents spend more on pizza then probably this is the reason. Incorrect
D) out of context
E) This study says most. (We are not concerned with all..)

C) children consume most.... most is relative word. it can mean 70% also and 99% also.

B) It provides us alternate reason for more fat content. (in conclusion it is mentioned that pizza and cookies tend to be plentiful (and not that parents eat plentiful). Similarly B provides that milk is also present in large quantity. Thus maybe milk is the reason.

IMO B
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by loving.achin » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:28 pm
Indeed C doesn't weaken the answer as the left over portion of pizza (which might be consumed by parents) can be the reason for increased fat.

In B, we are trying to refute the argument that pizza and cookies are the reason. We successfully do it by saying that milk is the reason.
Join the discussion