BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Fastfood

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:52 am
In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new lowfat oil to cook its Fast Fries, instead of the less healthful corn oil that it had been using. Now Fastfood King is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt sales of Fast Fries. However, this claim is incorrect, since according to Fastfood King's own sales figures, Fastfood King sold 10 percent more Fast Fries last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Fastfood King's claim?

A. Total sales of all foods at Fastfood King's locations increased by less than 10 percent last year.

B. Fastfood King enjoys higher profit margins on its Soft Drinks than it does on Fast Fries.

C. Fastfood King's customers prefer the taste of Fast Fries cooked in corn oil to Fast Fries cooked in lowfat oil.

D.The number of customers that visited Fastfood King locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.

E. The year before last, Fastfood King experienced a 20 percent increase in Fast Fries sales over the previous year

I felt bit tough on this CR.IMO E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:12 am
between A and D. I prefer A, because D does not mention, whether the increase in number of customers relate to increase in purchase of fries.

What is the OA ?
I think E strengthen's the Fastfood King's claim, 20% increase with corn oil and only 10% increase with low fat oil.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:14 am
Guys..any one there for this CR?
Join the discussion

by mp2437 » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:19 am
IMO A. Choice D merely states the number of customers visited, which is irrelevant to the scope of the fries. However, choice A states that total sales grew by less than 10%, whereas sales of fries grew more than 10%, which attacks the claim that the new oil has caused a slump in sales of the fries.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:56 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

by lav » Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:47 pm
whats the source of ques ??

Its a strengthening ques. We need to find an option that supports the claim "change back to corn oil as new lowfat oil hurted the sales"

confused between A and E
Kid in Verbal :(
Join the discussion

by adam15 » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:30 pm
is D, because in E, it says the year before
what is the OA answer
Join the discussion

by DeepakYakkundi » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:44 pm
IMO - D
Join the discussion

by DeepakYakkundi » Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:40 am
gmatmachoman , request you to post OA also when you post questions.
When the questions are tough, there will be numerous arguements between people and unless an expert steps in, we can't deduce whcih is correct one. hence posting questions which have OA will make sense.
Join the discussion

by f2006198 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:09 am
IMO A

The fact that the cumulative increase in the sales of all the products is <10% while fast fries itself accounted for a 10% increase over the preceding year strengthens the argument (gives greater claim to the '10% increase' of the fast fries).
Join the discussion