BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

faster method plz2

Expert replies
by raunekk » Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:22 am
The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?
(1) x > y
(2) xy/100< x – y


any other approach ,other then pluggin numbers??

thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gauravkhare » Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:36 am
i think 'D" is answer.

we can assume 1997 as 100, then 1998 becomes 100+x, and 1999 becomes 100 + (x-y) - xy/100. we need to find if term (x-y) - xy/100 is positive or not. both the statement are SUFF
gaurav
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:22 pm
sorry..its B

A is a trap!!

It took me 20 mins to solve this one.

Any other method
??
Stuart,Pls help!!

thanks
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:51 am
D is the answer. Moreover, both A and B lead to the same conclusion that X> Y, so if B is the answer, A should be the answer as well. statement B doesn't hold true if X< y since it will give a positive value. Atleast I assumed that we can only consider positive values for both x and y since they are percentages. I hope it's an OK assumption.
Join the discussion

Re: faster method plz2

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:06 am
raunekk wrote:The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?
(1) x > y
(2) xy/100< x – y


any other approach ,other then pluggin numbers??

thank you
This is quite an important one to understand for the GMAT. If anyone thinks Statement 1) is sufficient here, I'll make you an offer. Give me a thousand dollars. I'll increase your money by 60%, then decrease the result by 40%, then give you the final amount back. PM me if you're interested!

As for statement 2: If you start with, say, 100 dollars in 1997, you will have 100+x dollars in 1998 (starting value plus the increase). You will then have:

(100 + x) - (y/100)(100+x)

in 1999 (starting value minus the decrease). We want to know under what conditions this amount will be larger than the starting amount from 1997, which was 100:

(100 + x) - (y/100)(100+x) > 100
x - y - xy/100 > 0
xy/100< x – y

which is precisely what we're told in Statement 2. So 2) is sufficient, 1) is not. If you want, you can replace the starting value of '100' with some unknown 'C' here, though it won't make any difference to the conclusion.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:46 am
oops, my bad..I think I compared 1999 to 1998 instead of to 1997. In anycase, I want to understand if my approach is right or wrong.

Ian, can you please correct me if I'm wrong with the 1999> 1998 comparision. I chose some unknown value "a" for 1997(eventhough 100 would have made it easier :), so for 1998, we have "a + 0.0xa" and in 1999, we have (a+0.0xa)(1-0.0y). Comparing 1999 to 1998 =>

is (a+0.0xa)(1-0.0y) > (a+0.0xa), we can divide a + 0.0xa since both x and a are postive values and the should be a positive value without worrying about reversing the inequalities.,

=> is 1-0.0y > 1 ; since y is a positive value as well, would this equation be always true and so 1999 > 1998.

Now if I have compared 1999> 1997, this is how I would have went about solving it,

is (a+0.0xa)(1-0.0y) > a ; simplifying furthur,

is a(1+ 0.0x)(1-0.0y) > a => is (1+0.0x)(1-0.0y)> 1; which I think would be insufficient if x> y. But I did spend some time trying to figure out what values of x and y that can result in the value less then 1.
Join the discussion

by gauravkhare » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:24 am
oh yes... answer has to be 'B'. thankyou people. :P
gaurav
Join the discussion