BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

fast way?

Expert replies
by bacali » Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:45 am
This one took me about the full two minutes. Is there an easier way to go about these kinds of problems??


The average (arithmetic mean) of the 5 positive integers k, m, r, s, and t is 16, and k < m < r < s < t. If t is 40, what is the greatest possible value of the median of the 5 integers?

A. 16
B. 18
C. 19
D. 20
E. 22


OA: B
Last edited by bacali on Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by cramya » Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:55 am
Not sure if this is the fastest

k+m+r+s+t / 5 = 16 and k<m<r<s<t (so r is the median)

k+m+r+s+t = 80

k+m+r+s+40=80

k+m+r+s = 40

We have to maximize r keeping the constraint r<s

k cant be 0 since it says positive integers
k=1 m=2

Remaining 40-3 = 37 can be split as 19 and 18

r can be at the max 18

I am getting B)

Whats your approach to [spoiler]C)[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by bacali » Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:57 am
cramya wrote:Not sure if this is the fastest

k+m+r+s+t / 5 = 16 and k<m<r<s<t (so r is the median)

k+m+r+s+t = 80

k+m+r+s+40=80

k+m+r+s = 40

We have to maximize r keeping the constraint r<s

k cant be 0 since it says positive integers
k=1 m=2

Remaining 40-3 = 37 can be split as 19 and 18

r can be at the max 18

I am getting B)

Whats your approach to [spoiler]C)[/spoiler]
Yeah, sorry, I mixed it up while posting another Q. It's fixed.
Join the discussion