BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Farmers

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by madhur_ahuja » Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:37 pm
E is directly contradicting the statement. Other options are irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by italian7745 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:23 am
IMO E

Proportion has increased from 68% to 72%....

So let us consider the total population in 1850 was 100...so 68 farmers were and 32 was general population...

In the next 30 years population became 200...we know farmers are 72%....which means...in 1880...144 farmers were there...and balance population is 56...so the rate at which the no. of farmers have increased is greater than the rate at which general population increased....which direclty contradicts the stimulus....

If we consider that in the next 30 years population decrease ...for example population became 50...so 72% of 50 is 36...so the no. of farmers have decreased...this again contradicts...

If you consider the population constant...so no. of farmers shall be 72....and and balance population shall be 36..that means the balance population has decreased...this again contradicts....
Join the discussion

by kate.loo » Mon May 16, 2016 12:23 am
I believe the answer should be E
Join the discussion