BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Face value - grockit

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by beat_gmat_09 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:13 am
clawhammer wrote:Please explain the answer.

I calculated 95% of 630 and divided it with 25. Seemed pretty straight forward, and got 23.94 as answer. But OA is different. :(
Image
1.05x = 630
x = (630/105) * 100

x/25 = (630/105) *100 (1/25) = 24
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by clawhammer » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:25 am
This is one concept error I have made before. Can anyone explain, why calculating 95% of 630 did not work?
Join the discussion

by clawhammer » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:31 am
thanks a lot. i figured it out, somedays im just really really dumb.
Join the discussion