BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Eye Vision (Knewton Prep)

Expert replies
by RadiumBall » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:40 am
In an experiment, subjects with uncorrected vision were asked to identify sets of letters on charts located at different distances from the subject. This experiment yielded an unexpected result. Subjects who most successfully recognized letters from all of the charts experienced much less eye muscle contraction than those subjects who could recognize letters from nearby charts only.

Which of the following best accounts for the results of this experiment?


(A) People with better vision have eye shapes better adapted to focusing on objects at different distances with minimal contraction of their eye muscles.
(B) A person's eye muscles contract less when the person is reading stationary letters than when the person is looking at moving objects.
(C) Vision-correcting glasses can allow people to recognize distant objects even if their eye muscles are unable to contract.
(D) The subjects who were most successful in recognizing letters were least likely to experience eyestrain-induced headaches.
your answer
(E) Eye muscles contract when the brain recognizes the object on which the eye is focused.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rohu27 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:48 am
IMO A.
Join the discussion

by AIM GMAT » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:04 am
IMO A too .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by RadiumBall » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:38 pm
Correct OA: A

But why not D? Why A?
Is it that the techinical detail in A is preferred over simple wording in D?
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:46 pm
stimulus says people who recognise letters from all charts(implies people wth better vision) hve less muscle contraction. this is the result of the experiment. remember the Q asks us for a choice that accounts for this result. A gives us a choice which acounts for the same.

D no where gives us any reason which would help us try to relate to the result. it talks abt headaches.thts not the point here.

hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by RadiumBall » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:49 pm
Oh yeah...good point Thanks.
Join the discussion