Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Extinction of dinosaurs caused by asteroids

Expert replies
by pareekbharat86 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:17 pm
Some say that an asteroid colliding with Earth was responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs. It is indeed likely that such a collision did occur and that it caused the death of the vast majority of dinosaurs. However, new evidence suggests that perhaps tens of thousands of dinosaurs lived far enough from the point of collision that they were not directly killed by the impact or by the drastic change in temperature when immense dust clouds created by the impact blocked the sun. Some other force must have been responsible for the death of these remaining dinosaurs.

Which of the following, if true, is an assumption made by the author of the above argument?

a. The water supply used by the dinosaurs who survived the asteroid collision and subsequent change in global temperature had not become contaminated by lethal fallout from the collision.
b. A second asteroid impact or some other cosmic event is likely to have killed off the dinosaurs that survived the asteroid impact and global temperature change.
c. At least a few dinosaurs continued to exist for some years after the asteroid collided with Earth.
d. There is another existing theory that does a better job of explaining the extinction of the dinosaurs than the theory involving an asteroid collision with Earth.
e. The change in temperature caused when dust clouds from the asteroid impact blocked the sun could not have lasted for several years.

OA is A; isn't that way out of scope?

Source- Kaplan quizzes
Thanks,
Bharat.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by David@VeritasPrep » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:35 pm
Hey Bharat -

Another interesting question!

Answer choice A is not too far out of scope. In fact, I do not allow my students to use the phrase "out of scope" for any question other than Inference. You see, for strengthen and weaken, assumption, etc. you need to add new information. So the question is not, "is it out of scope" but rather "is it helpful?"

In this case choice A is helpful.

The conclusion is that "Some other force must have been responsible for the death of these remaining dinosaurs" so we need the dinosaurs to not have died from the results or aftermath of this particular comet. Choice A is helpful to protect our answer choice because it eliminates a possible cause of death that IS related to the asteroid. You can see that the other statements may be strengthen questions, but they are not required by the argument because they do not protect against something that would harm the conclusion.

Does that help?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by pareekbharat86 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:30 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey Bharat -

Another interesting question!

Answer choice A is not too far out of scope. In fact, I do not allow my students to use the phrase "out of scope" for any question other than Inference. You see, for strengthen and weaken, assumption, etc. you need to add new information. So the question is not, "is it out of scope" but rather "is it helpful?"

In this case choice A is helpful.

The conclusion is that "Some other force must have been responsible for the death of these remaining dinosaurs" so we need the dinosaurs to not have died from the results or aftermath of this particular comet. Choice A is helpful to protect our answer choice because it eliminates a possible cause of death that IS related to the asteroid. You can see that the other statements may be strengthen questions, but they are not required by the argument because they do not protect against something that would harm the conclusion.

Does that help?
Hi David,

Thanks for the reply. I get your point.
Thanks,
Bharat.
Join the discussion