Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Exposure

Expert replies
by abhishek.pati » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:39 pm
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

Can you please explain how the OA isC
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:44 am
known: no. of children sent for treatment has increased.
conclusion: either more exposure to chemicals or more sensitive to chemicals.

a)no. of school nurses is irrelevant
b) allergies to other substances is irrelevant
c) conclusion is that children are more exposed or more sensitive but maybe 10 years ago, children were not sent to nurses even if they had allergic reactions. Thus for conclusion to remain valid, likeliness that children are sent to nurses should remain same

d) even if chemicals are used in cleaners and pesticides, it supports the conclusion that children are more exposed now
e) irrelevant
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:34 am
why not D, D is more specific than C. Please clarify!
Join the discussion

by abhishek.pati » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:09 am
Hi Cans,
1 doubt.

conclusion is that children are more exposed or more sensitive but maybe 10 years ago, Agreed.
children were not sent to nurses even if they had allergic reactions.
For this part to be true they must be suffering from allergies which might not be happening at that point of time.
Thus for conclusion to remain valid, likeliness that children are sent to nurses should remain same
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:43 am
gmatblood wrote:why not D, D is more specific than C. Please clarify!
Hi

It is not D because IMO, the segment from the sentence "either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals" covers all places, incl houses,apartments etc. SO no need to assume that again.

The premise should be not explicitely mentioned. It should be hidden!
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion