Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Exponent question

Expert replies
by rerika01 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:45 am
I am trying to figure out how to solve this question. Thanks


If 3^x - 3^x-1 =162, then x(x-1)=?
A) 12
B) 16
C) 20
D) 30
E) 81
Last edited by rerika01 on Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kmittal82 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:00 am
The question is incorrect

If 3x - 3x-1 = 162, this means -1 = 162.

Can you pls correct it
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:16 am
I love the question and rerika's attempt to post the exponents as actual exponents (rather than the x^y) form, but it didn't quite translate.

I think I can break down the question, though (and it fits with the answer choices). It should read:


If 3^x - 3^(x-1) = 162, then what is x(x-1)?

A) 12
B) 16
C) 20
D) 30
E) 81


As it's written, the answer is C.





Explanation (I'll put in "spoiler" text since many have not been able to read the question yet):

[spoiler]It may seem awkward to do, but you can factor out a 3^(x-1) from both terms on the left hand side. 3^x can be written as 3^1 * 3^(x-1) in order to create that duplicate term to factor:

3^x - 3^(x-1) = 162
3^1 * 3^(x-1) - 3^(x-1) = 162
[3^(x-1)] (3-1) = 162
[3^(x-1)] * 2 = 162


Then you can divide both sides by 2 to get:

3^(x-1) = 81

As with any exponent problem with variables in the exponents, you should try to create the same bases:

3^(x-1) = 3^4

x - 1 = 4
x = 5

x(x-1) = 5*4 = 20

That's one, fairly direct way to do it. Another way would be to recognize that you need to find 3s on the right hand side of the equation to be able to do anything with the 3^variable terms on the left, and factor 162 into 2*3^4. Then you could either backsolve combinations of x and x-1 or work to find patterns with 3s and consecutive exponents.

Ultimately, I'd say that the biggest takeaway on this problem is that, when exponents appear with variables in the exponents, you should try to find common bases, and usually to do that you'll want to break numbers down into prime factors. [/spoiler]
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:36 am
rerika01 wrote:I am trying to figure out how to solve this question. Thanks


If 3^x - 3^x-1 =162, then x(x-1)=?
A) 12
B) 16
C) 20
D) 30
E) 81
3^x - 3^x-1 =162

factorise 162....
Right hand Side of the equation : 162 = 3^4 * 2
[spoiler]left Hand side of the equation :
3^x - 3^x-1 = 3^x(1 - 1/3) = 3^x * (2/3) = 3^(x-1) * 2

So,
3^(x-1) * 2 = 3^4 * 2
So (x-1) = 4 which implies x = 5
So (x-1)x = 4*5 = 20[/spoiler]
@Deb
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:41 am
Hey Brian,

I was actually thinking of this problem this way:

3^x - 3^(x-1) =162
3^x - 3^(x-1) = 3^4 + 3^4

Now I have the same bases, could I just take the exponents from here on?

x-(x-1)=4+4 <-- would this be right?

Thanks,
“Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.”
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:14 am
Hey Gurpinder,

I like the thought, but as you've probably noticed you end up with a nonsense equation from there:

x - (x-1) = 4+4
1 = 8 ----> Which is obviously not correct, and the xs are long gone.

The reason for that is that we can only strip off the bases if we have a one-for-one equality (like 3^(x-1) = 3^4). When addition or subtraction of exponents is present, we just don't have enough to be able to break off the exponents (a pretty important concept...we're really good at multiplication/division of exponents but terrible at adding/subtracting).

Think of it this way - we only add exponents when we're multiplying their bases. Here, we're adding/subtracting their bases, so we don't have any indication that we can combine the exponents. 3^4 + 3^4 is not 3^8...

Remember this - when using exponents, the majority of the rules we have are for multiplication/division of the same bases, so your goal should be to use factoring to get you in a position to use those rules.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 am
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey Gurpinder,

I like the thought, but as you've probably noticed you end up with a nonsense equation from there:

x - (x-1) = 4+4
1 = 8 ----> Which is obviously not correct, and the xs are long gone.

The reason for that is that we can only strip off the bases if we have a one-for-one equality (like 3^(x-1) = 3^4). When addition or subtraction of exponents is present, we just don't have enough to be able to break off the exponents (a pretty important concept...we're really good at multiplication/division of exponents but terrible at adding/subtracting).

Think of it this way - we only add exponents when we're multiplying their bases. Here, we're adding/subtracting their bases, so we don't have any indication that we can combine the exponents. 3^4 + 3^4 is not 3^8...

Remember this - when using exponents, the majority of the rules we have are for multiplication/division of the same bases, so your goal should be to use factoring to get you in a position to use those rules.
I kind of had the feeling that I just got a meaningless equation right in the beginning!

GREAT Tips!

Thanks Brian.
“Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.”
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:27 am
rerika01 wrote:I am trying to figure out how to solve this question. Thanks


If 3^x - 3^x-1 =162, then x(x-1)=?
A) 12
B) 16
C) 20
D) 30
E) 81
3^x -3^(x-1)=3^(x)-3^(x)/3=2*3^4 or 3*3^x-3^x=2*3^5 or 2*3^x=2*3^5
thus x= 5
and 5(5-1)=20
the answer is C
Join the discussion

by KrazyKarl » Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:13 pm
Good tips on using exponents...it's helpful to think of it that way that you should use factoring to get to a point where you can use the multiplication rules for exponents. Now that I think of it I've seen a lot of multiplication with exponents in practice but the addition/subtraction is harder, I guess because you have to turn it into multiplication to get it to work. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:38 pm
Hi,

I did it as below:

3^x can be grouped as a unit as say y.

So the equation now becomes :

y - y/3 = 162.

Solving this gets me y = 243.
So y = 3^x = 243 which solves as to x =5.

x(x-1) = 5 X 4 = 20 (C)
Sandy
Join the discussion

by fitzgerald23 » Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:34 am
Here is how I solved this:

3^x - 3^(x-1) = 162
3^x -(3^x)(3^-1)= 162
3^x(1-1/3)= 162
3^x(2/3)=162
3^x= 162 * 3/2
3^x = 81 * 3
x = 5

5 * (5-1) = 20

C. 20
Join the discussion