BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Exploitation

Expert replies
by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:39 am
Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Exploitation

by iamcste » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:27 am
2010gmat wrote:Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------

IMO A

S talks about Trade unions, exploitation protection of workers specifically

E talks about general Trade, exploitation of workers and work

So, Key term of Argument equivocates.
Join the discussion

Re: Exploitation

by kanha81 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 am
iamcste wrote:
2010gmat wrote:Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------

IMO A

S talks about Trade unions, exploitation protection of workers specifically

E talks about general Trade, exploitation of workers and work

So, Key term of Argument equivocates.
I agree.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:32 am
Great! you both knocked it...

How to approach these kind of problems? I felt that answer is E because both S and T are giving their opinions rather than basing their argument on fact....

And can anyone provide link to more such problems for practice?
Join the discussion

by kanha81 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:56 am
2010gmat wrote:Great! you both knocked it...

How to approach these kind of problems? I felt that answer is E because both S and T are giving their opinions rather than basing their argument on fact....

And can anyone provide link to more such problems for practice?
The key to identify correct answer is knowing the wrong answers. This is a Point at Issue type of question.

Here, the "trade" terminology was under discussion which was interpreted differently by the two speakers. I had listed [E] as one of the contenders, but the answer [E] only agreed to what Ravi had to say, and not with Sven. As we can see Sven represented facts and Ravi represented opinion, do differentiating between them is not going to help resolve the disagreement. In order to resolve something you need to reach a common ground or identify the cause behind issue as how that issue came into existence. Hope this helps.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:12 am
perfect dude...thanks a lot!
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:27 pm
I solved this in a different way.

I would do this as we do evaluate the argument.I will ask question for each of the option.
B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
if they rely on authorities, can they resolve? certainly no,we don't know what views authorities have
D) present supporting data
So one presents data about worker and the other gives data about the natural resources.....so can they resolve? No

Use similar approach and you will land up with A

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 3:48 am
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion