BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Explaining observed events

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:39 am
In an experiment, subjects with uncorrected vision were asked to identify sets of letters on charts located at different distances from the subject. This experiment yielded an unexpected result. Subjects who most successfully recognized letters from all of the charts experienced much less eye muscle contraction than those subjects who could recognize letters from nearby charts only.

Which of the following best accounts for the results of this experiment?

(A) People with better vision have eye shapes better adapted to focusing on objects at different distances with minimal contraction of their eye muscles.
(B) A person's eye muscles contract less when the person is reading stationary letters than when the person is looking at moving objects.
(C) Vision-correcting glasses can allow people to recognize distant objects even if their eye muscles are unable to contract.
(D) The subjects who were most successful in recognizing letters were least likely to experience eyestrain-induced headaches.
(E) Eye muscles contract when the brain recognizes the object on which the eye is focused.


Source : KNEWTON CAT

detailed reasoning + difficulty level

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:52 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:08 am
I actually misread this question the first time around, which made me pick E instead of A, which is exactly the trick answer!

A is correct here: people who were good at recognizing more objects had fewer contractions of the eye. However, if a person recognizes more objects, it is also clear that he/she has better vision. This option clearly states this.

B is incorrect simply because the movement of the objects is not discussed. We are focusing on distance only.

C - while this may be true, notice that you have there in the stimulus: subjects with uncorrected vision. This basically means that the people who were subject to this experiment did not wear glasses.

D is actually a consequence and not an explanation. It's obvious that if people get fewer eye contractions, then they'd have fewer headaches. Do not confuse the consequence with the explanation, it's only a trick!

E is incorrect because it states the very opposite of what is mentioned in the passage. If the eye muscles contract when the person recognizes an object, then the people who recognized the most objects must have had the higher number of contractions. This is inconsistent with the stimulus, where we are told that these people actually had fewer contractions. You see, it's easy to get tricked by this answer choice, like I was, if you do not read the stimulus correctly (I seem to be having this problem a lot lately, since I took a GRE mock test and got three quant questions wrong simply because I misread them!).
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:46 am
@Dana

What's that new GRE story?? One more 1600 on the rolls???All the best !!
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:47 am
Haha, no... I actually took a diagnostic test last night and scored a 790 on quant and a meager 520 on verbal... Vocabulary is not really my strong point! :)
Join the discussion