BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Experts, please comment.

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:26 am
In have some doubtds:
1. The preposition "with" after comma is sometimes seen. I feel confusion whether there is any usage of "comma +with".

Would any one clarify the use of "with" after comma?

2. In some sentences, I have seen a modifier started with "with".

When should we use an open modifier with "with"?

Related examples are given below from GMATPREP:

Example#01:
India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the West, to the more familiar Mogul food of the North

1. with each a product of their
2. with each as a product of its
3. each products of their
4. each a product of
5. each products of

Example#02:

In 1945, after a career as First Lady in which she shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman.

(A) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
(B) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly
(C) with an audacity never matched in the case of Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed as a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly
(D) with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
(E) with an audacity never matched either in the case of Abigail Adams or of Dolly Madison's, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rockeyb » Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:11 am
The preposition "with" after comma is sometimes seen. I feel confusion whether there is any usage of "comma +with".

Would any one clarify the use of "with" after comma?
I don't think there is any specific rule for comma + with . All you have to is find out if the preposition WITH is making sense in a sentence or not .

Ex : I will go WITH you.

He fought WITH his brother against the enemy .

So generally WITH is used to express the meaning of in addition to .
Example#01:
India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the West, to the more familiar Mogul food of the North

1. with each a product of their
2. with each as a product of its
3. each products of their
4. each a product of
5. each products of

As far as modifiers are concerned you need to check if the modifiers are modifying the right thing or not .

If you consider the example above sentence "Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking" needs to be modified by whatever comes after comma .

Now try putting preposition WITH after the comma what dose it mean = Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking IN ADDITION TO each a product of their . Dose that make sense ?

Well then preposition WITH is not needed 1 and 2 are out .

The pronoun THEIR is used to refer to Indian food not correct .

Between 4 and 5 I will go with 4.


Example#02:

In 1945, after a career as First Lady in which she shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman.

(A) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
(B) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly
(C) with an audacity never matched in the case of Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed as a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly
(D) with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
(E) with an audacity never matched either in the case of Abigail Adams or of Dolly Madison's, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman
(A) Audacity of Eleanor Roosevelt needs to be compared with audacity of Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison , also past perfect is wrong, eliminate.
(B) The pronoun SHE in the sentence "after a career as First Lady in which SHE shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been" need to modify Eleanor Roosevelt and not President Harry S Truman, eliminate.

(C) Same error as in B , eliminate .

My pick is between D and E and I will go with E .

Please correct me if me I am wrong .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by kstv » Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:39 am
Example 2 - Between D and E the option E appear a bit wordy. IMO D.
Join the discussion

by Fiver » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:07 am
gmat_perfect wrote: Example#01:
India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the West, to the more familiar Mogul food of the North

1. with each a product of their
2. with each as a product of its
3. each products of their
4. each a product of
5. each products of
I think a 'comma+with' construction when peceeded by a clause tends to modify the action in the preceeding clause
and in that sense refers to the subject of the preceeding clause.
I request experts to take this further.

However, in this sentence modifiers 'each a product of it's regional influences' and the following examples (dishes of the south...mogul food) must modify 'Indian food', hence if we drop the 'with' and only use 'each a product'(option 4),
IMO it tends to modify the 'styles of cooking' rather than 'Indian food'

I choose B here.
What's the OA?

For example 2, D is clear.
Join the discussion

by mj41 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:04 am
In the second one I was confused between D and E and went for E as "Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations " didn't sound right.

Any expert opinions
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:21 am
gmat_perfect wrote:In have some doubtds:
1. The preposition "with" after comma is sometimes seen. I feel confusion whether there is any usage of "comma +with".

Would any one clarify the use of "with" after comma?

2. In some sentences, I have seen a modifier started with "with".

When should we use an open modifier with "with"?

Related examples are given below from GMATPREP:
Ok here is its is :

comma + preposition (ex: with, in ) is an adverbial modifier .



What dose that mean , it means it modifies the complete phrase preceding the comma .

Lets see the example :

Example#01:
India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the West, to the more familiar Mogul food of the North

1. with each a product of their
2. with each as a product of its
3. each products of their
4. each a product of
5. each products of

In the above example comma + with is modifying the clause Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking
Obviously between 1 and 2 ,2 is correct because of the pronoun ITS correctly referring to Indian food .

Now what it really means is Indian food not only comprise of different styles of cooking but also each type of Indian food is a product of ITS regional influences .

Now having that sorted out I just cant seem to find any flaw in 4 and 5 and why they are wrong ?


However I would say this is a special case of construction and I think we should make a note of this as this same construction is seen in many GMAT question .


The construction is comma + with (noun / pronoun) + AS A ...


Here is another example from OG repeating the same construction.

The diet of the ordinary Greek in classical times was largely vegetarian-vegetables, fresh cheese, oatmeal, and meal cakes, and meat rarely

a,and meat rarely

b, and meat was rare

c, with meat as rare

d, meat a rarity

e, with meat as a rarity

In this example too comma + with (noun / pronoun) + AS A ... is given preference above other options .

So I would like to know more about this type of construction and its use . Any one has any inputs please share .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1