BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

EXCEPT question.

Expert replies
by sam2304 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:07 pm
Advocates of a large-scale space-defense research project conclude that it will represent a net benefit to civilian business. They say that since government-sponsored research will have civilian applications, civilian businesses will reap the rewards of government-developed technology.

Each of the following, if true, raises a consideration arguing against the conclusion above, EXCEPT:

(A) The development of cost-efficient manufacturing techniques is of the highest priority for civilian business and would be neglected for civilian business and would be neglected if resources go to military projects, which do not emphasize cost efficiency.

(B) Scientific and engineering talent needed by civilian business will be absorbed by the large-scale project.

(C) Many civilian businesses will receive subcontracts to provide materials and products needed by the research project.

(D) If government research money is devoted to the space project, it will not be available for specifically targeted needs of civilian business, where it could be more efficiently used.

(E) The increase in taxes or government debt needed to finance the project will severely reduce the vitality of the civilian economy.

Can someone explain how to approach these types of question ? I often get confused when i face these types of question.

Souce OG 10. OA is C
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by krishnasty » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:34 pm
IMO C..
Everything else is negating the advocate's claim that this project would harm the civilian business.
C actually strengthens the fact that if this project is put into place, civilian business would flourish..
---------------------------------------
Appreciation in thanks please!!
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:36 am
You have to select one answer that does NOT weaken or is neutral to the conclusion in the above argument

Conclusion: Net benefit to civilians

Look for 4 answers that will weaken this conclusion

Only C suggests a benefit, that it will provide more business to civilian firms
Join the discussion

by navami » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:50 am
Look for an option which does not weaken the aurgument.

Now read through the ans choices..

Advocates of a large-scale space-defense research project conclude that it will represent a net benefit to civilian business. They say that since government-sponsored research will have civilian applications, civilian businesses will reap the rewards of government-developed technology.

Each of the following, if true, raises a consideration arguing against the conclusion above, EXCEPT:

(A) The development of cost-efficient manufacturing techniques is of the highest priority for civilian business and would be neglected for civilian business and would be neglected if resources go to military projects, which do not emphasize cost efficiency.
Weakens

(B) Scientific and engineering talent needed by civilian business will be absorbed by the large-scale project. Weakens

(C) Many civilian businesses will receive subcontracts to provide materials and products needed by the research project. <-- This actually strengthens the conclusion ...

(D) If government research money is devoted to the space project, it will not be available for specifically targeted needs of civilian business, where it could be more efficiently used. Weakens


(E) The increase in taxes or government debt needed to finance the project will severely reduce the vitality of the civilian economy.

Weakens
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by ikaplan » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:06 pm
IMO C

Conclusion: civilian business will benefit from the space-defense project
You need an argument that will strengthen the conclusion

(A) The development of cost-efficient manufacturing techniques is of the highest priority for civilian business and would be neglected for civilian business and would be neglected if resources go to military projects, which do not emphasize cost efficiency.
Civilian sector will be weakened by the project (weakens the conclusion)

(B) Scientific and engineering talent needed by civilian business will be absorbed by the large-scale project.
Civilian business will be damaged by the project (weakens the conclusion)

(C) Many civilian businesses will receive subcontracts to provide materials and products needed by the research project.
If civilian businesses are sub-contracting parties of the project, then money from the space-defense project will be poured into the pockets of the civilian businesses owners (strengthens the conclusion)

(D) If government research money is devoted to the space project, it will not be available for specifically targeted needs of civilian business, where it could be more efficiently used.
If this project is conducted, the needs of the civilian business will not be satisfied (weakens the conclusion)


(E) The increase in taxes or government debt needed to finance the project will severely reduce the vitality of the civilian economy.
The civilian economy will be damaged (weakens the conclusion)
"Commitment is more than just wishing for the right conditions. Commitment is working with what you have."
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:33 pm
We are looking for something that doesn't contradict the idea that companies will "reap the rewards of THE TECHNOLOGY". C may mean that companies reap the rewards of government spending behind the project, but does not tell us anything about what happens due to the technology. So it is out of scope and therefore the correct answer.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion